I do know you have to be on the payroll of the company giving the voucher, so in your case you couldn't get one tax free from the dormant company.I have a variation on the same question. I have already given myself a €1,000 voucher from my company. However, I have a dormant company with €15,000 cash in it. Can that company also give me a voucher for €1,000 - even though I did not pay myself any salary from the company in 2022.
Revenue guidance refers entirely to the obligations of the employer, not the employee. I don't see any problem - if you have two genuine employers - from receiving a gift from both up to the €1,000 limit.My gut instinct says no, but would be interested to see if it is specified anywhere by revenue, or in legislation.
To me this sounds contrived and you would fall foul of section 811 TCA anti-avoidance rules.I have already given myself a €1,000 voucher from my company. However, I have a dormant company with €15,000 cash in it.
You are not an employee of the company, so noI have a variation on the same question. I have already given myself a €1,000 voucher from my company. However, I have a dormant company with €15,000 cash in it. Can that company also give me a voucher for €1,000 - even though I did not pay myself any salary from the company in 2022.
Open to correction, but I would think you will have to declare them as income. It is specified that you must be on the payroll of the company giving the vouchers.I have another variation of this question. I provide consulting services to a number of businesses. Two of them just bought me One4All vouchers for €250 & €200 respectively as a thank you for the services rendered during the year. What's the craic with these as a sole trader? Can I avail of the €1,000 exemption or what way should I treat them? I've queried it with my accountant but just wondering if anyone has encountered anything like this here.
No employer can reasonably be expected to know whether an employee has another employer and/or said employer is providing a voucher.Now one could argue that “by that employer” is implied, which might open up the possibility of people with multiple employments receiving multiple vouchers. I wouldn’t agree with that. In my view, it means that only one voucher (soon to be two) totalling €1,000 can be issued to any person.
In the scenarios which have given rise to the queries, the people literally own their own companies.No employer can reasonably be expected to know whether an employee has another employer and/or said employer is providing a voucher.
At the same time there is no legal obligation on an employee to reject a voucher from a second employer or to declare it to Revenue.
In the absence of such obligations it seems reasonable to assume that an employee can receive gifts from >1 employer once each is <€1,000.
Not in the OP's case where at face value the person simply has two jobs. This is not common but not rare either.In the scenarios which have given rise to the queries, the people literally own their own companies.
Based on a rather stretched semantic interpretation of the term "by that employer" and despite the complete absence of any obligation on an employee to refuse or declare a gift from a second employer.In my view, the legislation says that someone can’t get multiple €1,000s from multiple employers.
I would venture that the number of people with two unconnected employments both of which provide a €1,000 voucher could travel around Ireland in the same car.Not in the OP's case where at face value the person simply has two jobs. This is not common but not rare either.
Based on a rather stretched semantic interpretation of the term "by that employer" and despite the complete absence of any obligation on an employee to refuse or declare a gift from a second employer.
Say you work for Company A and receive a €500 voucher in June and cease employment with company A on 30 June. You start work with Company B and receive a €1,000 vouch on 31 December. Employee and employer have acted in good faith and it stretches credulity to assume there is some uncodified rule obliging you to refuse half of the second voucher.
Very clear advice. Many thanks.In my view, someone cannot receive multiple €1,000 vouchers from multiple employers.
Section 112B TCA 1997 deals with the scheme and Subsection (1)(d) currently states that;
“not more than one voucher or benefit can be given to that employee in any year of assessment”
The Finance Bill is changing “one” to “two” and elsewhere changing “€500” to “€1,000”.
Now one could argue that “by that employer” is implied, which might open up the possibility of people with multiple employments receiving multiple vouchers. I wouldn’t agree with that. In my view, it means that only one voucher (soon to be two) totalling €1,000 can be issued to any person.
I'm not so sure I believe @Gordon Gekko's interpretation
IMO the law clearly states that am employer may reward an employee a small reward of up to €1,000
it doesn't stat anywhere than an employee may receive a small reward of up to €1,000
so someone with multiple employments should be able to receive a voucher from each employer
The Finance Bill is adding the following:
“ ‘qualifying incentive’ means a relevant incentive that is the first or the second relevant incentive given to an employee in a year of assessment
Again, I think the absence of “by that employer” means that people can’t get €1,000 from different employers.
Yes, first or second incentive given to an ‘Individual’ is how it should be worded if they intended to restrict in this way, to my mind an ‘employee’ can hold multiple jobs, thus receive multiple incentives. Ambiguous wording.I'm not so sure I believe @Gordon Gekko's interpretation
IMO the law clearly states that am employer may reward an employee a small reward of up to €1,000
it doesn't stat anywhere than an employee may receive a small reward of up to €1,000
so someone with multiple employments should be able to receive a voucher from each employer
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?