Does anyone have any disadvantages they know of in taping the plasterboard joints and painting on top rather than skim coat plastering the full board before painting? A lot of new builds I see now are taping and painting, is this a cheap and lazy finish or perfectably acceptable nowadays?
Having lived in two houses with the plasterboard taped(it was very common in the 1970's houses), and having had to get the walls skimmed post other people's wallpaper, I think it is a very lazy finish and I would not put up with it.It's of course much cheaper from a builders point of view.
It is a "chaper finish"- no doubt, but if well executed it is very acceptable. If you want to paper your walls then skimming is the preferred finish. Taped finish is rapidly supplanting skimming as the norm on sites now.
A word of caution S.L.F. ........ if you are mushrooming the insulation boards it will be more complex. If going onto battens - you may have a convex shadow, as the eurathane side shrinks a little after being stuck onto the plasterboard.
A word of caution S.L.F. ........ if you are mushrooming the insulation boards it will be more complex. If going onto battens - you may have a convex shadow, as the eurathane side shrinks a little after being stuck onto the plasterboard.
Simeon I have battened a wall before and put Low-E insulation on to it then plaster-boarded. In that particular circumstance I had a plasterer in (actually I had 3 in but only 1 showed)