Take control of my pension now?

N

nest egg

Registered User
Messages
650
Hi, 38 year old who is thinking about taking control of his pension. The pot is currently 100% invested in a passive global equity fund. I had planned to take control of it before I turn 41, and stay passive, as otherwise it will automatically move to more expensive managed funds from then on.

Considering where the world is today though, I'm giving serious thought to fast forwarding that decision, and taking control now. My plan at 41 was to move to a 60 passive equity / 40 bond mix, rebalancing on an annual basis. Last but not least, I'd like the option to retire in 12 years time at 50 if I need to (the scheme allows for this).

Want to make an informed decision, throw stones please! :)
 
Have you worked out how much of a pension pot you require to retire at age 50? If you haven’t done that then figure out how much of your current income would you like to replace in retirement.

Id imagine that getting to that pot/income will involve maxing out contribution rather than switching from active to passive funds for the purposes of fees.
 
I’m in a similar position actually. However my view is that I’ll be putting the pension into an ARF invested in equities after retirement anyway, and if I got to 50 and equities were deeply depressed I could decide to work a few more years while they recover or perhaps keep my drawdown as low as possible from the ARF in the first few years of retirement.

Obviously your risk appetite, ability to continue working, other means to support yourself if you don’t draw down earlier etc will impact this, but shifting into power risk assets at 41 seems very excessively conservative to me! I may be at the other end of the risk spectrum, intending to leave it in equities right up to 50 however.
 
Whatever about the financial aspects of retirement at age 50 (with a potential 40 years of retirement) I would question de-risking in the run up age 50 if at 50 you are going to re-invest 75% into an ARF and perhaps invest in a Managed Fund type strategy (typically 70% Equity).
If on the other hand you plan to continue with a low risk strategy after age 50 in the ARF then the likelihood is that you are going to have to accept a very low rate of return (based on current environment). If your drawdown exceeds your net return then your capital will gradually diminish over time. And once you reach age 61 you must drawdown a minimum of 4% pa (5% after age 71).
I don't know what you expected fund size will be , what other income or assets you might have or what you retirement income needs will be, but retirement at age 50 is challenging, at least financially.
 
Fergal19 said:
Have you worked out how much of a pension pot you require to retire at age 50? ...
Id imagine that getting to that pot/income will involve maxing out contribution rather than switching from active to passive funds for the purposes of fees.
Click to expand...

Exactly, maximising contributions every year, my aim is to have a pension pot of approx 1.1-1.2m (assuming 5% p.a. returns between now and then), and overpaying the mortgage to have the house repaid. Whether I actually retire is another question all together, really it's about having the freedom to walk away. Staying in passive funds seems like a no-brainer to me, given the fees are lower, therefore maximising returns, unless I'm missing something?
 
Thinking further about this, after the 200k lump sum, is it better to pay the 20% on the next 300k, or leave it in an ARF?
  • Option 1: ARF of 1m (subject to income tax and 4/5% minimum drawdowns), and 200k investment pot subject to CGT.
  • Option 2: ARF of 700k, and 440k investment pot
I tend to favour Option 2, as it gives more flexibility, but haven't run the numbers yet.
 
mojoask said:
Thinking further about this, after the 200k lump sum, is it better to pay the 20% on the next 300k, or leave it in an ARF?
  • Option 1: ARF of 1m (subject to income tax and 4/5% minimum drawdowns), and 200k investment pot subject to CGT.
  • Option 2: ARF of 700k, and 440k investment pot
I tend to favour Option 2, as it gives more flexibility, but haven't run the numbers yet.
Click to expand...
Really depends on your expected marginal tax rate in retirement.
If you marginal rate Is 40% in retirement, then go for the higher lump sum.
At the other extreme, if your income is below the 20% tax threshold, then worth considering whether to pay 20% tax on the extra €300,000
 
And will 1.2m be enough for a potential 40 year retirement. After lump sum you would be left with an arf of 900k. With such a long retirement what would be a safe withdrawal rate? 2% or 3%. At 3% that would be 27k per annum. Will that be sufficient?

There’s a lot more to the active vs passive argument than just fees. Anyway I think all that is secondary until you get the first part right. once you have the first bit sorted you just deploy your funds accordingly. Then investment selection is important
 
mojoask said:
Thinking further about this, after the 200k lump sum, is it better to pay the 20% on the next 300k, or leave it in an ARF?
  • Option 1: ARF of 1m (subject to income tax and 4/5% minimum drawdowns), and 200k investment pot subject to CGT.
  • Option 2: ARF of 700k, and 440k investment pot
I tend to favour Option 2, as it gives more flexibility, but haven't run the numbers yet.
Click to expand...

Isn't the max you can take as cash 25% of the fund value??

So If you have a pension pot of €1m then the 25% = €250k. you need €2m pension pot to get €200tf + €300@20%

Therefore for €1m you "only" have 200k tax free plus 50k at 20%
 
50andOut said:
Isn't the max you can take as cash 25% of the fund value??

So If you have a pension pot of €1m then the 25% = €250k. you need €2m pension pot to get €200tf + €300@20%

Therefore for €1m you "only" have 200k tax free plus 50k at 20%
Click to expand...
Correct
 
50andOut said:
Isn't the max you can take as cash 25% of the fund value??

So If you have a pension pot of €1m then the 25% = €250k. you need €2m pension pot to get €200tf + €300@20%

Therefore for €1m you "only" have 200k tax free plus 50k at 20%
Click to expand...
The Pensions Authority:

Tax
Tax on lump sums at retirement
The first €200,000 of pension lump sums payable is currently (2016) tax free. This is a total lifetime limit even if lump sums are taken at different times and from different pension arrangements. Lump sums between €200,001 and €500,000 are taxed at 20%, with any balance over this amount taxed at your marginal rate and subject to the Universal Social Charge.
The amount of cash you can take out of a pension arrangement is limited, with different rules applying depending on the type of arrangement you have.
For RACs, PRSAs and people transferring to AMRF/ARFs at retirement, the cash limit is 25% of the retirement fund.
The amount of cash you can get from an occupational pension scheme at normal retirement age is broadly 1.5 times your Final Remuneration, if you have completed 20 years’ service and have no benefits from a previous scheme
 
It’s 25% of the value of the fund if you’re ARFing or 1.5 times salary (sic) if you’re buying an annuity.

You can’t mix and match.
 
moneymakeover said:
Doesn't that suggest the cash limit, strictly speaking is

200k plus 0.8 times 300k plus fully taxed remainder if so choose

So maybe as per OP he might choose option 2
200 +240 = 440
Click to expand...
No.
The overall lump sum limit is either 25% of the fund OR 150% of Final Salary (in which case you must use the residual fund to buy an Annuity- current rules).
So if the estimated fund is €1m, then the 25% gives a lump sum of €250,000. The first €200,000 is tax free and the extra €50,000 is taxable at 20%. So a net €40,000, giving a total lump sum of €240,000.
 
Conan said:
No.
The overall lump sum limit is either 25% of the fund OR 150% of Final Salary (in which case you must use the residual fund to buy an Annuity- current rules).
So if the estimated fund is €1m, then the 25% gives a lump sum of €250,000. The first €200,000 is tax free and the extra €50,000 is taxable at 20%. So a net €40,000, giving a total lump sum of €240,000.
Click to expand...

Thanks, that's much clearer than the guidance I'd read. If I achieve a 1.2m pot, 25% is 300k, of which 100k would be taxed at 20%, leaving me with 900k ARF, and 280k pot to invest.
 
Fergal19 said:
And will 1.2m be enough for a potential 40 year retirement. After lump sum you would be left with an arf of 900k. With such a long retirement what would be a safe withdrawal rate? 2% or 3%. At 3% that would be 27k per annum. Will that be sufficient?
Click to expand...

That's the million dollar euro question. Taking the lump-sum and investing it would provide a pot of 1.18m, at 3.5% drawdown rate, 41,300 p.a. (in 2032 Euros). Not exactly a lavish lifestyle, but with the mortgage paid off, would cover the essentials. That's not of course the life I'd want to live, but that's a different question...

Going back to the original question, does anyone think it's the wrong choice to take control now? If doing so, what are people's views on introducing bonds into the mix?
 
Not really sure what you mean by “take control now”? I assume that within your existing structure you have a choice of funds, so to that extent you can control the fund mix as is.
As for increasing the Bond mix, current Bond yields are extraordinarily low, so any increase in the Bond yield will result in a lower capital value. Bonds do well when Interest rates are falling. But how much lower can rates go Over the next 10 years? Bonds are not necessarily a lower risk option than Equiries.
 
Conan said:
Not really sure what you mean by “take control now”? I assume that within your existing structure you have a choice of funds, so to that extent you can control the fund mix as is.
As for increasing the Bond mix, current Bond yields are extraordinarily low, so any increase in the Bond yield will result in a lower capital value. Bonds do well when Interest rates are falling. But how much lower can rates go Over the next 10 years? Bonds are not necessarily a lower risk option than Equiries.
Click to expand...

Currently the pension pot is automatically managed by the pension provider. Once I turn 41, they start progressively moving portions into other actively managed funds, bonds & eventually cash, so that by the time I hit 65, it's all in a very safe, very low yielding portfolio. That might have been fine in the days where you would buy an annuity, but I don't think that's a great idea these days.

My thoughts on including an equity / bond mix is that it's less volatile, which is important when you're drawing down every year. By taking control now, I would in effect, start the process earlier than planned to move towards a 60/40 mix by the time I hit 50.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top