In the case of an investment home loan: The voluntary sale of the property left a residual. The bank had discussed a 50:50 split of the shortfall. Following the sale the bank 'forgot' all about this 'offer'. The bank are now moving to seek summary judgement on the residual owed. Is the 50:50 'offer' worth anything now? Recorded call and full transcript of same is available.
Also; a document online (by an Irish Barrister) points to 'Provision of Capital repayment' being a potential defence against a bank seeking a summary judgement - I would be grateful if anyone has any further meat to add to the bones of this assertion.
Thank you, Lone Star
Also; a document online (by an Irish Barrister) points to 'Provision of Capital repayment' being a potential defence against a bank seeking a summary judgement - I would be grateful if anyone has any further meat to add to the bones of this assertion.
Thank you, Lone Star