galway_blow_in
Registered User
- Messages
- 2,102
If the stock price remains the same the option value will fall, whether it is a Call or a Put, but it can't fall very much in one day.
Well in this example you are very far In the money. The Intrinsic Value is 60 and there is effectively no Time Value. If the price doesn't change the pay off will be 60, which is its current Intrinsic Value.Say I bought puts $ 277 in a stock two days ago when underlying price was $347 and underlying price right now is $217 , with closeout tomorrow at 9pm , will put be worth more tomorrow the closer we get to 9pm if underlying price remains $217 than the Put price is valued at right now with underlying stock price @ $217 ?
Well in this example you are very far In the money. The Intrinsic Value is 60 and there is effectively no Time Value. If the price doesn't change the pay off will be 60, which is its current Intrinsic Value.
Now if its current price was $270 that is a different kettle of fish. The Intrinsic Value is €7 but there is still some Time Value left. Back of the envelope calculations might say that there is a 50/50 chance the price will move 10 either way. If it falls 10 you gain the whole 10 but if it rises 10 you only "lose" 7. It is an asymmetrical situation and the Time Value would be about 50% of 3. As time passes the 50/50 possible price moves shrink and so too does the Time Value.
Gosh so this is a real example!I'm not smart enough to work that out to a competent degree so I closed out the option, gain of $5800 from a $157 stake two days ago
If its worth $ 7000 tomorrow evening, so beit
I do understand that if the underlying stock price was $200 tomorrow evening, the put would then be worth $77, I was just wondering if the correlation is greater as you approach close out time even with underlying price remaining the same as now
If I'm reading you correctly?, should underlying stock price be $217 at 9pm tomorrow evening, Put price should not be any more valuable than it is right now with underlying price at $217
Absolutely brilliant.I never intended to exercise the option
I paid $1.57 two days ago for the April 22nd $277.50 Put
Absolutely brilliant.In effect you finished with a str8 short position on Netflix which must have fallen even more since you closed, but as I say your option had effectively become a str8 short. Don’t blame me if Netflix continues to fall.
I know you didn't start with a short but that is effectively how it finished. You should ignore the history of your exposure. Your current position was that you were up over $5k and that was your exposure, the $157 was history. You were effectively totally exposed to the upside i.e. an exposure of over $5k as it was extremely unlikely that Netflix would recover all its recent losses in the next 24 hours. It was a brilliant "bet" no doubt.Not a short ,max exposure was $157 , I bought a Put ,selling one a different story as is regular selling short where downside limitless
This is a fascinating counter to the thread “The Perils of Shorting”.I never intended to exercise the option
I paid $1.57 two days ago for the April 22nd $277.50 Put
just means the position - trade is now closed - finishedThis is a fascinating counter to the thread “The Perils of Shorting”.
What does “Square” mean in the description of the trade?
I see it finished at $214 so your decision to Square early cost you c. $300. I hope you don't hold me in any way to blame
What inspired you to do this? Is it a one off or are there many more which "missed"?
BTW I know that options are not the same as Long/Short positions but as they get further in the money they approach these positions. With a day to go your Put was so far in the money that from a pricing point of view it was a short.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?