You've ignored inflation.- Just worked out if a private sector worker starting on €20,000 a year, invested 6.5% of their salary for 40 years, they would have €322,621 at the end. This assumes growth of 6% per annum and a pay increase of 3% each year.
First I will deal with the Union Issue you brought up ,That article is a hatchet job. In this example, the public servant has contributed to their pension for 40 year as well as their PRSI contributions. They are compared to someone who has never contributed to a private pension in their life, just their PRSI.
Why not compare what the situation would be if they had contributed 6.5% of salary to a defined contribution pension for 40 years?
- Just worked out if a private sector worker starting on €20,000 a year, invested 6.5% of their salary for 40 years, they would have €322,621 at the end. This assumes growth of 6% per annum and a pay increase of 3% each year.
It also highlights the benefits of being in a union, a body that a lot of private sector workers won't pay for.
Steven
http://www.bluewaterfp.ie (www.bluewaterfp.ie)
MrEarlThere are so many valid points being made in this discussion thread that we should really split it into a few discussion threads at this stage....
But that image showing what the retiring politicians are taking as pensions, is one that seems to have been missed, and shouldn't have been....
While we've all the politicians running around promising us the earth, moon and stars... The first thing that we should demand that they should be doing, but they won't, is to bring their own pensions closer in line with everyone elses!
That article is a hatchet job. In this example, the public servant has contributed to their pension for 40 year as well as their PRSI contributions. They are compared to someone who has never contributed to a private pension in their life, just their PRSI.
Why not compare what the situation would be if they had contributed 6.5% of salary to a defined contribution pension for 40 years?
- Just worked out if a private sector worker starting on €20,000 a year, invested 6.5% of their salary for 40 years, they would have €322,621 at the end. This assumes growth of 6% per annum and a pay increase of 3% each year.
It also highlights the benefits of being in a union, a body that a lot of private sector workers won't pay for.
Steven
http://www.bluewaterfp.ie (www.bluewaterfp.ie)
I get what you are posting lots don't , lots pretend down my neck of the woods not to understand because they know well the PRSI will have to be reformed hitting the people under paying at present for there state pension,Why would I make that comparison, the article is not about the occupational part of the pension, it's about the State Pension.
Why would I make that comparison, the article is not about the occupational part of the pension, it's about the State Pension.
I am retired I meet up with all types of retired people,I have being in a discussion where one of the retirees was a retired public servant who started work in 1995/96 under the new scheme (her sister started under the old D stamp a few weeks before her), She took the side of Charlie on it, She said she still had the direct read charts showing her pension deductions, she is well clued in on pensions along with being very fair minded person,Public servants don't receive the State pension earlier than anyone else.
Public servants don't receive the State pension earlier than anyone else.
I get what you are posting lots don't , lots pretend down my neck of the woods not to understand because they know well the PRSI will have to be reformed hitting the people under paying at present for there state pension,
Down where I live the people saying the don't mind seeing the age going to 68 have one thing in common they never payed much PRSI and were in a position to divert the savings into a private pension and get a tax break off the people who they expect to work to 68,
I know and I didn't say otherwise if I can refer you back to the article:
"Her public service pension is worked out at €27,045 a year. When this is added to the State pension of €12,956 gives her a 50pc final salary pension, according to calculations by pensions expert Tony Gilhawley of Technical Guidance.
But she won't get the State pension until she is 67.
Provided she is not working, her public service employer will pay her a 'supplementary pension' of €12,956 a year between retirement at 64 and State pension age at 67."
While not in receipt of the actual State Pension, they will receive the same rate as it to bring their pensions up to (insert) /80ths as per the terms of their retirement package.
Private sector no,But doesn't the change in the state pension age affect private pensions too? Aren't they now "integrated" with the State pension and therefore they now won't receive the state pension part until they reach the age?
That is the terms of their occupational pension scheme that was negotiated years back. Public servants contribute to this scheme from day 1 in the public service. They also pay the Additional Superannuation Contribution as well as their PRSI contributions.
It is completely different to someone who just pays their PRSI contributions.
Steven
http://www.bluewaterfp.ie (www.bluewaterfp.ie)
Private sector no,
Just for the record I was out for coffee with some retirees today the increasing of the pension age came up , all of the public service retirees in the group agree it is unfair on the private sector worker to increase pension age,
That is private pension sales talk, I don't want to muddy the waters so to speak , to be fair to the public servants I know and understand pensions say Charley Weston is correct ,others who say different Don't fully understand,But the increase applies to everyone because as Steven pointed out, nobody receives the State Pension until they reach that age, maybe Private pensions have allowed for this - so the only people really suffering from the age increase are those who don't have a private pension, which is a lot of people.
That is private pension sales talk, I don't want to muddy the waters so to speak , to be fair to the public servants I know and understand pensions say Charley Weston is correct ,others who say different Don't fully understand,
Hi HunterWhat is private pension sales talk?
Just to add, I too think Charlie is correct in respect of us receiving our full pension entitlements when we retire through this supplementary pension, this was my initial query when I found this site.
I was told a load of nonsense, which I have subsequently queried again and am awaiting a response.
are you public or private sector,
However, they have very different rules for themselves and i don't hear sinn fein or labour complainingThis is one of very few unpopular but prudent decisions made by a government that I'm aware of. It makes perfect sense to increase the retirement age as people live longer and in better health.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?