Stamp Duty Clawback

G

Goldie

Registered User
Messages
37
As a first time poster i must admit that i am very impressed with the wealth of information contained in the forum.

My query relates to the clawback of stamp duty for a FTB who rents out (not under rent a room scheme) their property during the five year clawback period.

I have been asked by a number of friends how revenue would know you have rented the property and that you now have a SD liability. Personally i am not condoning tax evasion but i want to be able to let these people know how their 'idea' will actually be scuppered by Revenue. Would they have to make a declaration when selling the property that it hasn't been let, no tax liabilities etc???

I want to know so that i can let them know and its up to them to make an informed decision on their own tax affairs? Thanks.
 
The Irish taxation system is a Self Assessment System. As such it is up to the individual to properly maintain their own tax affairs. On the slae of the property the individuals should complete a return of capital gains on which they make various declarations- one of which would relate to the renting of the property.

However, regardless of that declaration, they are tax evaders on a range of taxes from SD, to income tax and capital gains tax. REvenue may not catch them but they could face serious penalties etc if caught.
 
Goldie said:
I have been asked by a number of friends how revenue would know you have rented the property
Click to expand...

Who knows? Only Revenue knows, and they won't tell. Anything is possible including the following:

- report from a tenant
- claim from a tenant for tax relief
- examination of archives of letting ads, letting agents records
- use of the land registry database of properties and property owners to compare against...
: electoral registers
: social welfare databases
: the Revenue's own database
: TV licence databases operated by An Post
- etc etc etc

I'm a bit puzzled why you want to take it upon yourself to "advise" your friends. Sounds like as good a way to lose friends as any. Why don't you let them fend for themselves?
 
Don't forget that by not being above board as they are legally obliged to be they lose the ability to offset 100% of mortgage interest and other allowable expenses against rental income. The immediate monetary benefits accruing from tax evasion in relation to investment properties could be a lot less than people assume and the potential monetary and other penalties that could arise if/when evasion is uncovered could be significant.
 
Thanks for the replies. This was a topic that was raised over a few drinks with my friends recently. The attitude of most was 'i'd take a chance', i don't agree and at the time i didn't have the info to substantiate my arguement. Cheers.
 
Okay, I'm having a minor stroke reading this post.

I bought an apartment in December 2002 for €187600. I was a First Time Buyer so I didn't have to pay stamp duty. I lived in it until August 2005. It has been rented out since then.

I thought that once I had registered with the PRTB and was declaring my rental income, that was all I needed to do to fulfil my tax and landlord obligations.

I never even heard of stamp duty clawback til a couple of months ago. Up until last night I thought it was only payable if you were selling within five years of purchase. I don't intend to sell my property.

Do I owe stamp duty clawback? If so, can someone please calculate how much?
 
FilthyRich said:
Do I owe stamp duty clawback? If so, can someone please calculate how much?
Click to expand...

You owe stamp duty at the rate applicable to investors at the time you purchased the apartment, payable from the date the apartment was first rented, so in theory, interest and penalties apply from that date up until the date you file your payment and return. I make the rate of stamp duty to be 3%.

FilthRich said:
Up until last night I thought it was only payable if you were selling within five years of purchase. I don't intend to sell my property.
Click to expand...

This is a widely held misconception. I have two friends who believe it to be true. One is a trainee solicitor, the other is a qualified solicitor.
 
FilthyRich said:
Okay, I'm having a minor stroke reading this post.

I bought an apartment in December 2002 for €187600. I was a First Time Buyer so I didn't have to pay stamp duty. I lived in it until August 2005. It has been rented out since then.

I thought that once I had registered with the PRTB and was declaring my rental income, that was all I needed to do to fulfil my tax and landlord obligations.

I never even heard of stamp duty clawback til a couple of months ago. Up until last night I thought it was only payable if you were selling within five years of purchase. I don't intend to sell my property.

Do I owe stamp duty clawback? If so, can someone please calculate how much?
Click to expand...

Sounds like you are liable to clawback, it does not apply when you sell withing 5 years but it does if you no longer occupy the house as your primary residence
 
CCOVICH said:
This is a widely held misconception. I have two friends who believe it to be true. One is a trainee solicitor, the other is a qualified solicitor.
Click to expand...

So in short never get tax advise from someone not qualified to give it, unless the solicitors also studied tax, which does happen!!!!
 
Eeek!!!! said:
You should get some information here:
Click to expand...

I checked out Eeek's link and have copied this info from it.

*If the first-time buyer rents the house within five years Revenue will claim back or 'clawback' the difference between the higher stamp duty rates and the duty actually paid. The only exception to this is the 'Rent a Room' scheme where part of the house is rented out. If the house is sold within five years there is no clawback.



Now can anyone explain this to me: If I decided to sell the apartment within the five year period, I wouldn't have to pay stamp duty clawback. Therefore, do I not have a five year period in which to decide whether I'm going to sell or not? Surely, no clawback should be required before this five-year period has expired?

What's the point in my paying the clawback now if I'm still entitled to sell the apartment in a few months' time without having to pay it? (This is hypothetical as I have no desire to sell. But I'm a woman and we're allowed to change our minds!)

Would they refund it to me? Hardly!
 
FilthyRich said:
Now can anyone explain this to me: If I decided to sell the apartment within the five year period, I wouldn't have to pay stamp duty clawback. Therefore, do I not have a five year period in which to decide whether I'm going to sell or not? Surely, no clawback should be required before this five-year period has expired?
Click to expand...

It's very simple-you can take 5 years to decide whether you want to sell it or not. This does not give you the right to rent it while you are deciding.
 
"A stamp duty 'clawback' arises where rent, other than under the 'Rent a Room scheme' is obtained within the five year period (or up to the date of a sale during this period) from the date of the purchase deed. The amount of the clawback is the difference between (a) the stamp duty payable at the higher rates which would have applied at the date of the purchase deed and (b) the lower duty (if any) paid as a result of obtaining the benefit of the reduced rates. "

You're not reading it correctly,once you rent out the property other than the rent a room scheme within 5 years you ARE liable for stamp duty.

If you go over the 5 years and then rent it out there is no clawback.
As a first time buyer you didn't pay any stamp duty,if you sell the property without having rented it out within 5 years there is no clawback.

From the info you have posted you ARE liable for the clawback and should have paid it 12 months ago,you can find the interest and penalties by searching as someone posted them on another thread.
If i was you i would contact the revenue,before they contact you i'm sure they will deal with you sympathetically.
 
Just curious, what happens if FilthyRich decides to move back into the property and then sells it at a later date?
 
liteweight said:
Just curious, what happens if FilthyRich decides to move back into the property and then sells it at a later date?
Click to expand...

You become liable for stamp duty from the moment you start to rent out the place. What you do subsequent to that is irrelevant.

Maybe you're thinking of the CGT liavbility that he'll be liable for upon selling?
 
If a property bought as an owner occupier PPR is rented out (other than under the rent a room scheme) within 5 years of purchase then the SD clawback applies. End of story. And moving back into it as one's PPR doesn't change that one iota. Moving back in might mean that less of a CGT liability arises when the property is eventually sold. Basically on a sometime PPR/sometime rented property some portion of the eventual resale gain is assessable for CGT. This portion is calculated with reference to how long the property was rented versus a PPR. This is explained many times in many similar threads.
 
With all anti avoidance systems intoduced into legislation you must look at the reason behind the need for a clawback provision then you will fully understand how it works
The stamp duty clawback rule is to avoid abuse of the relief given to owner occupiers of new properties under 125sq mts. Without the clawback you would get investors buying poperties claiming occupation, staying for one night and then renting out. Thereby ensuring no stamp duty cost.
Therefore, logically it does not apply should you decide to sell, the five year period to me is a mute point it could be lowered, maybe a year or two would be appropriate?
 
bazermc said:
With all anti avoidance systems intoduced into legislation you must look at the reason behind the need for a clawback provision then you will fully understand how it works
The stamp duty clawback rule is to avoid abuse of the relief given to owner occupiers of new properties under 125sq mts. Without the clawback you would get investors buying poperties claiming occupation, staying for one night and then renting out. Thereby ensuring no stamp duty cost.
Therefore, logically it does not apply should you decide to sell, the five year period to me is a mute point it could be lowered, maybe a year or two would be appropriate?
Click to expand...


I see your point bazermc. And thank you to everyone else for your replies. I just feel a bit sick at the moment. I wasn't trying to con anyone when I bought my apartment. I wasn't an investor. I thought it was going to be my home for a long time to come. My circumstances changed. I met someone and we decided to buy a house together.

I thought I was doing everything by the book. I didn't know anything about Stamp Duty Clawback. If I had known about it I would have paid it on time. Now it appears my ignorance is going to cost me a lot in penalties.

My username is not reflective of my current financial state. It was reflective of a dream. This day has just been absolutely rotten.
 
bazermc said:
With all anti avoidance systems intoduced into legislation you must look at the reason behind the need for a clawback provision then you will fully understand how it works
The stamp duty clawback rule is to avoid abuse of the relief given to owner occupiers of new properties under 125sq mts. Without the clawback you would get investors buying poperties claiming occupation, staying for one night and then renting out. Thereby ensuring no stamp duty cost.
Therefore, logically it does not apply should you decide to sell, the five year period to me is a mute point it could be lowered, maybe a year or two would be appropriate?
Click to expand...

Very good. I get that!

Howitzer I wasn't thinking of capital gains. Just thought I saw somewhere that there were some exemptions from the Stamp Duty claw back with regard to travelling abroad i.e. if a FTB had to leave the country at the request of his employer???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top