Hi,
I am executor of my mother's estate comprising of a house and farmland. Everything has been left split 3 ways between myself and 2 siblings. Grant of Probate has been received (did that on my own, and would recommend anyone with a straightforward estate to do likewise and save a fortune!).
One sibling isn't interested in the house and would prefer more land in lieu.
The other sibling and I are more emotionally attached to the house.
We all get along very well and no animosity or greediness is a worry, thankfully.
The general idea is instead of 33% each it would be something like the following. (for the purposes of simplicity, let's assume the monetary values of the shares are equal, as they will be once the split is done)
Sibling 1 - 40% of land
Sibling 2 - 30% of land & 50% of house
Sibling 3 (Me) - 30% of land & 50% of house.
So far that seems straightforward enough to me (although I presume I will need to have the land surveyed and the proposed new boundaries measured/planned/etc.).
However, regarding the house, I was considering tenancy in common rather than joint ownership. Is there any benefit to choose one over the other? It's my understanding that in the event of my death, my share of the house would be passed onto my beneficiaries whereas joint ownership would mean it automatically transfers to the surviving joint owner instead.
Is there anything I should be aware of regarding future tax/inheritance issues on either path?
I am executor of my mother's estate comprising of a house and farmland. Everything has been left split 3 ways between myself and 2 siblings. Grant of Probate has been received (did that on my own, and would recommend anyone with a straightforward estate to do likewise and save a fortune!).
One sibling isn't interested in the house and would prefer more land in lieu.
The other sibling and I are more emotionally attached to the house.
We all get along very well and no animosity or greediness is a worry, thankfully.
The general idea is instead of 33% each it would be something like the following. (for the purposes of simplicity, let's assume the monetary values of the shares are equal, as they will be once the split is done)
Sibling 1 - 40% of land
Sibling 2 - 30% of land & 50% of house
Sibling 3 (Me) - 30% of land & 50% of house.
So far that seems straightforward enough to me (although I presume I will need to have the land surveyed and the proposed new boundaries measured/planned/etc.).
However, regarding the house, I was considering tenancy in common rather than joint ownership. Is there any benefit to choose one over the other? It's my understanding that in the event of my death, my share of the house would be passed onto my beneficiaries whereas joint ownership would mean it automatically transfers to the surviving joint owner instead.
Is there anything I should be aware of regarding future tax/inheritance issues on either path?