time to plan
Registered User
- Messages
- 910
Thanks for that explanation - really good to know what question it was answering.My understanding is that the 4% rule is based on a portfolio invested in stocks and bonds.
It was trying to solve for:
- What % of the starting portfolio balance,
- can an investor spend (increasing by inflation),
- for at least 30 years,
- with a very high probability of success (100% I think, or maybe slightly lower),
- from a stock/bond portfolio (I think it was 60/40),
- based on historic US data of returns from stocks and intermediate term bonds,
- given the worst period of returns.
4% was the result.
I would want to adapt it significantly to manage the very high risk that my retirement would be impacted adversely by spending less than I could, or that alternatively I would retire unnecessarily late due to working longer to achieve a pot that I could draw down to my desired income to meet this 4% rule. Risks have to be balanced.
Life expectancy has actually started falling in America (especially for males). I'd say our obesity problem wouldn't be too far off theirs.Life expectancy for people in the 30-50 range must surely he higher, plus the level of exercise people undertake and better more proactive healthcare.
Yes there is more than one way to skin a catSo get rid of the car and health insurance and you have 4k for holidays a year. Also good for your blood pressure to walk rather than drive
Life expectancy has actually started falling in America (especially for males).
Not so sure about that - my parents have an additional pension of about 75 euro a week on top of the state pension but if it were not for my father's accumulated debt of 9l from years of refusing to let a failed business wind up properly they'd live very nicely indeed. In fact my mother manages to save around 2k a year just out of the housekeeping he gives her. It all depends on your lifestyle. Like, using your free travel pass instead of driving in Dublin will save you around 10 euro on every trip.As other have mentioned, I think you will struggle to live a fulfilling life on the state pension (c.€1,200 p/m) even if you own your home.
You will only be able to afford the bare essentials.
You can forget owning a car or taking a holiday abroad.
You will never be able to buy anyone anything.
You will be severely limited in what social activities you can participate in.
Just one unexpected €1,000+ expense and you will be wiped out for a year.
You will be constantly anxious about money and bills.
You will be able to survive, but that's about it.
Bit confused at this; is he paying for his keep or is she an employee?the housekeeping he gives her.
Her running away money savings is it?Not so sure about that - my parents have an additional pension of about 75 euro a week on top of the state pension but if it were not for my father's accumulated debt of 9l from years of refusing to let a failed business wind up properly they'd live very nicely indeed. In fact my mother manages to save around 2k a year just out of the housekeeping he gives her. It all depends on your lifestyle. Like, using your free travel pass instead of driving in Dublin will save you around 10 euro on every trip.
Clearly the husband "hands up" a certain amount of money for the wife to run the household. This would hsve been extremely common over the years. Pretty sure my own dad would have done this years back. Then my mum sorted bills, groceries etc..Bit confused at this; is he paying for his keep or is she an employee?
Yes, it’s quite old school now but was very common years ago.Clearly the husband "hands up" a certain amount of money for the wife to run the household. This would hsve been extremely common over the years. Pretty sure my own dad would have done this years back. Then my mum sorted bills, groceries etc..
This can work well if the marriage is a partnership but can lead to financial abuse if it is a negative situation.
Dad pays the household bills like electricity, oil fills etc, and the mother does the weekly shop - he gives her a fixed amount every week for this which is far more than the actual shop, but she buys birthday/Christmas presents/cards etc which he cannot be bothered doing. My mother gave up work in 1972 so they are kind of old fashioned, yes. Not unusual for that age group - their late next door neighbour used to insist on getting itemised receipts back from his poor wife for everything she spent. A lot of older couples don't have joint accounts or don't trust each other.Bit confused at this; is he paying for his keep or is she an employee?
That's exactly the case - he gives her about half of what he gets from his state and private pension. He pays for the household utilities and repairs, and she covers shopping, presents, most clothes, her own medical bills and cards for people. He used to pay her health insurance but she covers that herself now because he's still steeped in debt and cannot make ends meet out of his half.Yes, it’s quite old school now but was very common years ago.
As far as I know, you draw it down as you see fit. You can draw down in lots of any amounts, or fewer large amounts. When it's gone, it's gone.This is a topic very much on my mind recently and maybe I am worrying more than I should be as well.
Maybe a silly questiin, but is there a guide on how to figure out what your private pension income will be.
For simplicity, say I have a pension value of 100k.
I retire at 60.
I take 25% tax free, leaving 75k in the pot.
How is the annual pension amount thereafter determined?
Nobody knows how long I will live, so how do they decide what the annual amount will be?
Is there a rough guideline that the pension companies use?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?