ubiquitous
Registered User
- Messages
- 3,782
Do guidelines not exist that bills should be sent out quickly. I mean do you guys make so much money that you can wait a couple of years to start sending out invoices? I've never heard of such a thing. It's different if you sent out an invoice and didn't get paid and send reminders, but why after the second strongly worded reminder would one not sue for the debt?
The op has been collecting the post from the apartment address which the solicitor has for 6 years now...
hi,we bought a house over 6 yrs ago from my mother( was my grandparents housre). we have rented it since and pick up post every now and then---never anything really there for us.anyhow our solicitor who did that sale for us has just comntacted us through my parents saying they have unpaid solicitors fees we need to pay. they say they tried contact us at an apartment we lived in (in another town) at they time of the sale.
and i agree with some posters who said that where would OP stand if she had realised that the solicitor owns her 5k. nobody would really care than either and instead would tell her "tough but nothing you can do about it" and i doubt that the solicitor then would feel morally obliged to cough up
Are you serious??? The Law Society would force the solicitor to repay her on demand.
mf1;697020 I might tell them that the debt was statute barred but I'd suggest they pay it if they owe it. I definitely would not act for them if they were sued - why would you act for someone who won't pay a colleague fees? mf[/quote said:I didn't ask about a colleague's fee and that is where the problem is, I asked if a client came with a plumber's bill of more than 6 years what would you tell them to do. What if it was your best client of 20 years standing? Not to do something against a colleague is not a good reason not to act for someone and I'm surprised you said it, but I do understand your loyalty to colleagues, what if the bill arrived after 20 years because the solicitor was incompetant?
The "statute barred" restriction does not apply to client funds held by solicitors. The Law Society compels all such solictors to repay all such sums on demand, regardless of how long the funds have been held. Which pretty much undermines your argumenti meant that if she realised after 6 years the solicitor owed her money she or someone else for that matter could not demand it back from him/ her because of the "statute barred" situation and nobody would care if he doesn't pay except for her. .
Thank you for that FKH ( I was beginning to feel I was defending the indefensible) I of course know that solicitors don't like to act against one another, (understandably particularly in a small country, nor do other professionals) that's why the Law Society have a list of solicitors that will and everyone is entitled to legal representation no matter who is being sued.It's not my job to tell people what to do, rather to advise them on their legal options which in this case would be that there is no legal mechanism to force payment of the debt. The fact that the debt is owed to a solicitor rather than someone else is irrelevant.
Personally I wouldn't sue a colleague and I know most solicitors feel the same way Bronte.
5 that solicitor has since been in contact and apologised firstly we should not have been contacted as the bill would have been out of date but more importantly, their system at the time was very outdated and they mislaid the information stating we had paid in full. they have since located it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?