L
Larkhill Jo
Guest
Hello,
I had a call today from the solicitor that was hired to look after the convayency on a property my girlfriend and I purchased in December 2005. He advised me that he incorrectly processed the stamp duty at the rate applicable to first time buyers instead of the appropriate rate hence a shortfall on the amount of stamp remitted to the Revenue.
What frustrates me is that there were two distinct occassions when he asked and noted our status as non-FTB. Is this not the reason solicitors are hired to ensure that all aspects of the purchase are addressed accurately at the time?
Do I have any option but to accept his error and come up with the difference and make payment. Surely he cant be exempt of any responsibility on this.
Thanks for any feedback or suggestions you might have.
I had a call today from the solicitor that was hired to look after the convayency on a property my girlfriend and I purchased in December 2005. He advised me that he incorrectly processed the stamp duty at the rate applicable to first time buyers instead of the appropriate rate hence a shortfall on the amount of stamp remitted to the Revenue.
What frustrates me is that there were two distinct occassions when he asked and noted our status as non-FTB. Is this not the reason solicitors are hired to ensure that all aspects of the purchase are addressed accurately at the time?
Do I have any option but to accept his error and come up with the difference and make payment. Surely he cant be exempt of any responsibility on this.
Thanks for any feedback or suggestions you might have.