I think we agree that the word (RICH) means little in isolation.
I think we agree that the nominal rich ie over k100 are not rich/wealthly in any meaningful way.
I think we have 3 camps ,
The under k100 who mistakingly believe that k100 = rich & wealthy .
The k100 people who work hard to provide for their families ,who by no means can be called wealthy.
Those who inherited wealth by virtue of birth .
Am inclined to believe these inheritors should be (soaked) ( its the pinkie in me !)
When you look at the rest of the world nearly all of us in Ireland have it good.There's a fourth camp. Those on 100k who live modestly and have no financial worries and consider themselves rich. They don't have 161 Mercs or mansions in D4 but realize how good they have it when they look at the rest of the world.
But there is no tax increase. Everyone will pay less.
If they abolish it they will replace it with something else.Nevertheless, that was the context of the article.
OK. What's your opinion on its merit?I just referenced the context of the newspaper article, without expressing any opinion on its merit.
OK. What's your opinion on its merit?
Mr Noonan said the USC abolition would cost €4 billion in gross terms, but this would be offset by a clawback mechanism on salaries over €100,000."
I'd like to think so but their 3 strikes and you're our nonsense is a major turn-off.renua starting to look more attractive
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?