A blanket testing of the entire population is the only way to identify who has it and who has not. Make it easier to stop this in its tracks and end this rumbling on off lockdowns
Anitgen tests like they are using will certainly weed out a lot of extra cases, they're a lot quicker and cheaper than the testing we're currently using, but with that you have to accept up to a 50% false-negative rate. So it's not the silver bullet to ending lockdowns, but certainly could still have a role in a more effective proactive model.
Whereas with a high false negative rate you have people out and about who should not be.
It would probably be useful to give a broad overview, if only to back up the trends we see from the more accurate but localised testing.That's a very poor false-negative rate. A poor false positive rate would be preferable - people isolating who don't need to.
Whereas with a high false negative rate you have people out and about who should not be.
Even though the inventor of the test said that it shouldn’t be used to test for viruses.Great idea.
But you can test negative today and positive tomorrow. Some famous fella can’t think of his name but he got 4 tests close together and two came back positive and two negative.A blanket testing of the entire population is the only way to identify who has it and who has not. Make it easier to stop this in its tracks and end this rumbling on off lockdowns
Have you a link to what they said specifically?Even though the inventor of the test said that it shouldn’t be used to test for viruses.
Some famous fella can’t think of his name but he got 4 tests close together and two came back positive and two negative.
Elon Musk - wouldn't be the first time he's said stupid stuff on Twitter.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?