It already is. It's paid pro-rata based on the number of contributions/credits if the 2,080 required for the full pension isn't reached.One could think the level of pension could be based on the level of prsi contribution.
And judges would have to apportion lifetime PRSI contributions in a divorce settlement. Very messy.Would sharing contributions with your spouse be away forward?
I was thinking at the amount paid not only the number of contributions.It already is.
That would probably conflict with the "social" aspect of PRSI?I was thinking at the amount paid not only the number of contributions.
Lots of countries have social security systems which provide benefits — particularly retirement benefits — of amounts that are proportional to earnings, which is pretty much the same thing. But they are very, very expensive; those countries tend to have massively high social insurance contributions.The pension is based on the number of contributions one has. There could be lots of other systems. However there always have to be some rules. One could think the level of pension could be based on the level of prsi contribution. Or any other way.
If you pass before your wife she could apply for widows pension etc.
Presumably your wife is pre 95.She returned to work in the private sector and will only have 460 contributions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?