I think that would be a really stupid thing to do, you can really only legitimately use your veto once therefore it must be of crucial national importance. Are you suggesting we use this veto to maintain a very low corporation tax which ultimately benefits the richest technology companies on the planet. The optics of that would be terrible.Ireland has a veto, when it comes to the EU agreeing to things like tax harmonisation, and we should use it, even if it does upset a few of our bigger European partners. It won't be a surprise to them, anyway, given we will just be maintaining our clear long term position on Corporation Tax.
Why should the EU care, seeing we let the cost of living get out of control, we are an Island if we mess up it's our own fault,We need to think about the future, not just the present, and the past.
We are a country with very limited natural resources, we cannot compete on price given higher overheards (ultimately due to the cost of living), and incur higher costs to inport / export goods and services, due to being an island.
Ireland has a veto, when it comes to the EU agreeing to things like tax harmonisation, and we should use it, even if it does upset a few of our bigger European partners. It won't be a surprise to them, anyway, given we will just be maintaining our clear long term position on Corporation Tax.
Our fishing industry was only ever accessing less than a quarter of the potential catch. There's no way we were ever going to put in the infrastructure to fix that. This is like (but nowhere near as stupid) as the argument that we gave away billions worth of oil and gas.You say we have no natural resources but we have one very valuable natural resource that we have given away , fishing . We were laughing at the Brits for making such a big deal out of fishing . Surely if we were to use a veto on anything it should have been on fish, yes it is a small part of our economy now but that is precisely because we have handicapped it. We would be on much stronger grounds morally to fight for our rights on this .
I agreeOur fishing industry was only ever accessing less than a quarter of the potential catch. There's no way we were ever going to put in the infrastructure to fix that. This is like (but nowhere near as stupid) as the argument that we gave away billions worth of oil and gas.
Access to the EU is about trade and we've done remarkably well out of that. We have a large sector of highly efficient and capital intensive multinationals. They are the engine of our economy and we need to look after then. Farming as a sector is like a massive FAS scheme where totally unsustainable businesses are kept alive with huge subsidies. Agriculture has been on the Covid Payment for the last 48 years.
I think that would be a really stupid thing to do, you can really only legitimately use your veto once therefore it must be of crucial national importance. Are you suggesting we use this veto to maintain a very low corporation tax which ultimately benefits the richest technology companies on the planet.
Do you mean where they manufacture the product?There will be new pressure on the MNCs to locate back to where they sell most of their products
That's where it gets complicated. Most of Apple's products are manufactured in China but the manufacturing cost is probably less than 20% of the retail price. Apple have around 20% of the global smartphone market but around 80% of the profits.Do you mean where they manufacture the product?
thats where Ireland got the biggest benefit, the ability of the tech companies to move the IP to Ireland. Everyone knows most of the IP was developed in California even after all the globalization the brains of the tech companies still reside predominately in California. The tech companies know that there is no threat that a competitor will emerge in Ireland that is why they are so comfortable moving it here. However they are very wary of the Chinese stealing their IP .And that's just Apple.
Pharma companies are even more complex. The first pill costs $3 billion, the second one costs a cent. Where was the IP developed? We know where it resides but where should it reside?
I agree with this in a way.This is quite irrelevant afaik what Ireland does as the US idea is that in case country x is not raising the tax the US will just present a higher tax bill to companies for the delta. And Ireland can't veto a US law - doesn't matter how many bowls of shamrock are sent over for Paddies day...
I think you'll find a pretty substantive link between the activity taxable in Ireland and the work of the Irish-based staff.Most of what Facebook pays in Corporate Tax in Ireland at 12.5% has sod all to do with what their staff does in Dublin.
"Silicon Dock" is a stupid name anyway, there is absolutely no silicon on those docks, the only silicon is in Intel in leixlip probably the only significant technology manufacturer in the country. A truer name would be "The global IP export and taxation dock"Facebook etc are not going to pull out of the Silicon Dock because suddenly their corporate tax rate is going to jump to 1
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?