Surely the summary numbers above are a cause for concern? Clearing €75 before tax, other costs (e.g. insurance, maintenance costs etc.), vacancy periods and inflation are considered. The ongoing yield here is probably zero or negative. So the original poster is banking on capital appreciation. Fair enough if they want to do this but they need to understand the risks and assess the viability of the investment and its suitability to their own specific circumstances. If they already have a good diversified portfolio of savings/investments and this is a higher risk one that they want to keep then that might make sense. If this is their main or only investment then this too would be a cause for concern in my opinion.am I missing something here.....you have a sitting tenant paying your mortgage and you want to sell and a bunch of lemmings tell you to cash in your chips at just the wrong time?
And buy even more property too!?!Give me a break and listen to your accountant!
Their yield/return right now is worse as far as I can see!3. with whats left put it into deposit which is a non performing entity relative to inflation which only serves to bolsters rabobank balance sheet!
The value at the time that it became an investment property is irrelevant. What matters is how long it was rented out for and how this determines what proportion of the TOTAL gain since acquisition is assessable for CGT.I'm a bit confused now markowitzman.... The house was originally my PPR and valued at €340k when I moved out therefore I dont think CGT will be applicable if I sell at 330K.
There are strong arguments for not doing this and keeping an rental property mortgage interest only.Also rents are coming down in the area. I was initially thinking of changing the mortgage to capital and interest repayments and making additional payments
OK - if what you paid was the same as what an investor would have paid then there is no SD clawback. Just needed to tease that out.Thanks Clubman. I bought it in Jan '01, it was an old house which I paid stamp duty on as I wasn't a ftb.
Sorry - my mistake. I was assuming (for simplicity) acquiring it in January 2001 and selling it in January 2009 which is 8 years ownership. I'll fix my post above.You calculated 9 years rather than the 7 since I bought it (2001-2008)?
Correct - you would have benefited from the owner occupier exemption from CGT which extends to 12 months beyond vacation of the property as one's PPR.If I had sold it in jan '06 I wouldn't have had to pay a penny in tax
It's to stop people benefiting from owner occupier benefits and immediately converting the property to a rental/investment.it seems very unfair
You won't suffer a loss unless the disposal price falls to c. €175K!that while the value of the property has gone gone down since then and I'll effectively suffer a loss that I should pay any CGT at all???
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?