There are probably ways of making up 26 contributions that are easier, less costly, and less liable to open up an unwanted can of worms (if DSP even take this whole thing seriously in the first place, which I doubt).That is correct. The contributions were never paid. But they should have. And we are looking into this to find out how that can be achieved.
Indeed- the employer broke the law. No doubt about that.It's also about an employer breaking the law. That may have consequences, regardless of their irrelevance to your friend's desire to rewrite the past.
Anyway, seeing as you've already made up your mind about this, why bother asking the members of this forum for their views?
At that time it was the only possibility for someone not too long out of school and having no qualification to get a foothold on the job market. Many employers "out in the sticks" ran parts of their business that way. They had fully registered staff as the core staff- and took on young lads looking for some money to be able to go to the pub and impress the girls. That was mostly done during the summer months, depending on the business but also at other times.
Any judge and jury would show at least an interest in witnesses and written evidence.
It won't take too long for SW to solve this when everybody involved is interested to clean this up without resistance.
Happy Christmas to everyone.
Hopefully all coming years-specially those with a full PRSI count!What year?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?