I have a problem relating to Dun Laoghaire Rathdown’s share ownership scheme through which I ‘purchased’ a house in 2001. I outline the problem below and wonder if anyone can advise me as to where I should go for advice on this matter.
The redemption value of my house is now €207,942.66, which is €17,442.66 more than it originally cost (£150,000 in 2001, the equivalent of €190,500). This has been unsatisfactorily explained to me by various people in the Dun Laoghaire Rathdown county council in terms of recent CPI fluctuations. Regardless of this explanation, which I only partially understand, the upshot for me is that at the end of my 25 year share ownership mortgage (in 2026) I will owe a lot more for my house than I originally borrowed due to the fact that the county council’s rental equity (60%) is continuously rising and negating the mortgage portion of the scheme. To put it simply I have paid the county council more than €69,000 over the last seven years and yet I now owe them more than I originally borrowed. How much worse will the situation be after another eighteen years?
There may be financial logic to this but when I purchased my house it was advertised as a scheme which would help people, like myself, who had no other way of purchasing a home. I can now only see it as at best an unfair and flawed scheme and at worst taking advantage of financially vulnerable people, desperate to provide a home for their family. When I purchased my home through the share ownership scheme I was a single mother of a four year old and had just been given notice in the flat I was renting. I was on the housing list but it was made clear to me that I would be waiting for a very long time. I was desperate but not stupid: if it had been explained to me that the county council’s rental equity might rise to the extent that it might become impossible for me to ever own my home, or even that 40% portion of it which I was led to believe I was paying off as a normal mortgage, I would certainly have made a different choice. If I were dealing with a private financial institution I feel I would have legal recourse on the basis of having been sold an inappropriate financial scheme.
I did understand that the county council’s share would have to be paid off eventually but shareholder home owners are given an option to buy out a portion of the county council’s share each year and it was not made to seem urgent. My own approach had been that when my son was no longer dependent I would have more income to use for this purpose. I realize my mistake now but again the consequences of not doing so early and with large sums was not explained. The scheme is means-tested. When I applied for the scheme, I only qualified because I was earning less than £25,000 per year. A person earning such an income is hardly likely to have much extra income after paying more than £700 per month in mortgage to the county council. I find it hard to believe that the county council thought it likely that these extra sums on top of the mortgage would be forthcoming in the early stages of the loan period.
If the value of the county council’s rental equity continues to rise, as presumably it will, then at the end of the term of 25 years I will owe the county council to the extent that I will have to sell my home just before I enter into retirement.
I only discovered this situation when I rang the county council for the redemption figure. There must be quite a few other people in the share ownership scheme who have no idea of the situation and may not discover it for several years. Surely the county council should at least have contacted its customers and outlined the changed situation thus giving them the option to buy out of the scheme before it is too late.
I am unsure who to turn to for advice on this matter, but my own anger, and fear for other people in this situation obliges me to do something. Is there anything that can be done in terms of advice or publicity for the benefit of others who either have a share ownership loan or who are considering taking one out? Should I make a complaint to the financial regulator or the financial ombudsman?