H
What we want to do is,sell the house and reinvest the money so it isn't in our name. As were rerturning to college next year, we'd be better with benefits if we didnt have that house.
If you are selling a property that was always your Principal Private Residence and never rented out etc. then any capital gain is exempt from CGT.Hi,
We bought a house as first time buyers.
What we want to do is,sell the house and reinvest the money so it isn't in our name. As were rerturning to college next year, we'd be better with benefits if we didnt have that house.
How would we be taxed if the profit was used to purchase an overseas property in someone elses name?
The sale price less the outstanding mortgage would be yours free of any tax. Obviously you would also need to allow for selling (e.g. legal and estate agent) costs. However I too don't really understand the rationale behind disassociating yourself from this money other than perhaps in an illegal attempt to shield it from SW in order to claim benefits to which you would not otherwise be entitled (e.g. due to means test).We'd only have about 80k capital.
A means test will most likely take savings into account - including any lump sum capital gain from such as sale. But (at least for some means tests) the first €20K is disregarded and only the excess affects payments. For a married couple I believe that this means that they can have €40K in savings before means tested payments are affected (once again the means test may be different for different payments - I am basing this solely on my superficial knowledge of the non contributory pension means test). The SW website should have details of the means tests applicable to all non PRSI linked means tested allowances.100% honestly- I was told that the capital would count as income in a means test, yes.
Who told you this? It is totally wrong if you are talking about a capital gain from the sale of your PPR. In that case any capital gain is tax free.I was also told we'd lose half of it in capital gains tax.
Your initial suggestion about seemingly hiding the money by ostensibly putting it somebody else's name and/or investing it abroad still sounds dodgy and makes no sense other than, say, in the context of SW fraud.If we wanted to do something dodgy, I could simply rent out the house, cash in hand and have ducked stamp duty. Problem solved but we don't want to fraud the state. Though as anyone would, we want to prrotect or future by boxing clever but legally.
Or to be more accurate, problem solved right up until the day you get into a dispute with your tenant and they decide to report you to Revenue.If we wanted to do something dodgy, I could simply rent out the house, cash in hand and have ducked stamp duty. Problem solved
Or to be more accurate, problem solved right up until the day you get into a dispute with your tenant and they decide to report you to Revenue.
You are assuming that my comment was solely directed at you. Bad assumption.Also somewhat irrelevant as I've pointed quite clearly it's not what we'd do.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?