Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,561
I have to agree with this from personal experience. We have never had private health insurance. My husband was diagnosed with bowel cancer in late 2013. His diagnosis and operation could not have been quicker. I cannot fault his treatment since. There is an occasional administrative slip up, but the medical staff are fantastic.The really expensive treatments such as cancer and heart are treated very well in the public health system.
Compared with tales I hear from family in the UK, waiting 3 weeks to get an appointment with a GP being common
But I thought if you paid for the the diagnosis privately you still had to go back on the public list for treatment so could still be a bit of delay getting the treatment?
In public hospitals, health insurance gives you...better access to procedures. If a consultant has a theatre list and can perform 10 procedures on that list, their contract may allow them to do 2+ private cases on that list of 10. Straight away the public patients who have private insurance have a 25% better chance of getting a spot than someone without insurance.
Hi arbitron
This used to be the system, but it's not supposed to happen any more. There is supposed to be one queue and earlier private diagnosis is not suppose to allow you to join that queue any earlier.
I do agree with you that private and public hospitals should be totally separated, so that the perception that private patients get quicker treatment in a public hospital should be killed off.
Brendan
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?