my god, thats my worst nightmare!!!
that site is filled with inaccuracies and incorrect information.
dont want to throw this thread off topic,but.....
I dont agree with the basic premise of the whole website.
The first two paragraphs of the 'why self build' seems to purport that any new build is a type of 'self build', which of course is not correct.
there are three types of construction projects:
1. Hiring a contractor to do the whole build
2. 'Direct Labour' where the client becomes the project manager and sub contracts most jobs.
3. Self build where the clients physically builds many of the elements themselves.
I know of no construction of a dwelling where the client didn't have any say into the design, specification or selection of materials. This website seems to say that thus every build where the client has any input whatsoever is a self build, this simply isnt correct.
All this website is doing is describing the proper and correct procedures in the standard construction project, which is a good thing (although there are inaccuracies)
maybe im just being pedantic, but self building to me is not what that website is about.
There are specific building regs mentioned that are incorrect, namely the disabled access reg and the escape window reg. Its a very dangerous thing to do to just synopsise the building regs. it needs to be constantly upgraded, or simply link to the current regs on http://www.environ.ie (www.environ.ie)
Sydthebeat,
I would disagree with your take on what Self build is.
Your focus is too strictly on the word meaning and I accept your point that it implies a build by oneself. However in reality, industry wide, not only in this country but it the UK, US, Australia, a lot of Europe, the term Self Build is used primarily to distuinguish between a commercial developer built house/project and a private build.
There are obviously degrees of scale and a Self Build project using a main contractor is a lot closer to a turn key developer project, but there is crucially still a difference ... control.
Even with a contractor you as the Self Builder are the owner of the project. You still have to oversee the contractor and ensure he is building to your spec and using the exact materials spec'd and not lower quality substitutes for example.
Whether or not you get down or dirty and do physical work or trades is only semantics, but having said that invariably every self build project will always always always require the Self Builder to muck in at some point or other.
In addition your three categories could be broken out further
- Contractor to shell stage. DIY or Direct labour basis to finish. By your definition what is this then classed as ?
- Project Manager.
Self build is more about taking control as opposed to doing the actual work.
You may have a point in that the words used in their strictest sense have been hijacked to a degree, but does it matter in the end ... not in the slightest !
This is of course a generalisation and admittedly some people do end up trying to go down this route without even having any of the most basic required abilities to manage or control the project. But I would say this is the minority as opposed to the majority.
.
by the way lets all apologize to Birroc who started this post in the hope of getting some advice and now is watching his thread disintegrate into a mass of 'self-build' discussions ...
Best of luck with the build - mine started 3 weeks early and then instantly ground to a halt on excavation and now we are bore-holing samples 10 metres down and are already 3 weeks behind ... won't bore you with the details - be prepared for delays ... and I haven't even laid a block or foundation yet!!
best of luck birroc!!!
our advice ... prop your gables if you have them upstairs ....