Update on this and I will keep it brief.
There are other complaints. There may be social and/or addiction issues involved.
Have spent some of yesterday evening and today following up. Told correct way not to confront. That's all I can do. Glad I followed up.
93% of communication is non verbal so your tone of voice
I love these stats ... really!!
http://www.spring.org.uk/2007/05/busting-myth-93-of-communication-is.php
http://extremepresentation.typepad.com/blog/2006/09/93_of_communica.html
[broken link removed]
... and that's just from a quick Google search. So let's just say I strongly disagree.
Ok lets say that particular stat is wrong...would you not agree that its not only the words we use but the tone, body language etc that shapes how we communicate?
Obviously in those scenarios I'd agree with ye! But how about these ... do you think it would be the same if your little darling drew on the walls and you said in exactly the same angry tone "Don't do that, look at the mess you made" or some such versus "You little f&^er look what ye did" ... would ye consider those the same? Anyway as ye said we're digressing here!
There are other complaints. There may be social and/or addiction issues involved.
Update on this and I will keep it brief.
There are other complaints. There may be social and/or addiction issues involved.
Have spent some of yesterday evening and today following up. Told correct way not to confront. That's all I can do. Glad I followed up
.....how did you establish that?
ICE: When another poster said shouting was OK swearing was not I felt that was more to do with the parent not wanting to be seen to be using bad language rather then the effect of the child......
my personal opinion on this would be the same tho, no matter what tone or stanse you are using 'bad words' are not acceptable to a child, if a child said the 'f' word, no matter in what context then the child would be punished! so why use that language towards a child???... thats my opinion anyway.
I too am agast that confidential information was given out about this situation and to be honest I am not sure I believe the OP's update...I think it could have been more to assert on this forum that he/she was right and we shouldn't have doubted her ...
Did the garda find the mother based on the licence plate.....surely social welfare would not have access to this information? I find it hard to believe that the garda would go to this effort on such sketchy details....
Anyway, apologies if that is not the case but thats my take on it....
Just a suggestion to the parents who find taking their kids to the supermarket a huge ordeal, you should consider ordering online and having the shopping delivered? It only takes a couple of minutes to order and is a godsend.
.... and to be honest I am not sure I believe the OP's update...I think it could have been more to assert on this forum that he/she was right and we shouldn't have doubted her ...
....
2. There may (and I said may)be other problems involved. I personally believe this to be the case.
I dont think you were called a liar here, and if it came across like from me i apologise, i would also think if there was anyway you could put on here how u managed to report it etc, or to who? it would help others, especially as other people will come across an incident like this and would like to know what to do.
i also however dont think from one incident like this an assumption on ''addiction or other problems'' could be made.
Blossy
Did I say anywhere that the information was tracked from a Licence plate? I said that was the information I had on the day. Use your loaf. I am not going to spell it out for you.
can you confirm then, for those of us who worry about such things, that the Data Protection Act was not compromised by anybody (be it in Social Services or another state body)?.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?