I read your statement as an endorsement of his (bono's) right to choose what his due tax should be spend on instead of having to pay tax like the rest of us. If I'm wrong feel free to clarify what you did mean to say.
The whole U2 thing (moving certain portfolios/income to another EU country to reduce their tax burden) is legitimate tax planning. There's nothing illegal about it so obviously he has a "right" to avail of this.
Don't forget that hundreds of thousands of Irish workers are employed by multinational companies whose presence here is solely or primarily for similar tax planning purposes.
The whole U2 thing (moving certain portfolios/income to another EU country to reduce their tax burden) is legitimate tax planning. There's nothing illegal about it so obviously he has a "right" to avail of this.
Would that we all had the luxury to play God when it comes to deciding when our debt to society had been discharged and imploring the same society to do more for the less fortunate in another one. Sweet.
A matter of opinion. But what counts in practice is matters of law. If you think it's objectionable then why not lobby your elected representatives to change the system as it stands?
Would that we all had the luxury to play God when it comes to deciding when our debt to society had been discharged and imploring the same society to do more for the less fortunate in another one. Sweet.
I have no objection with Bono going down any legal avenue to save himself a few pence in tax (we would all do the same) as long as it stops him banging on about how stingy developed countries are with charity donations every two minutes.