I don't think anyone would claim that it would be a fantastic idea, all else equal, to put your money on deposit for 5 years.Deposit rates are not important to most people. The differences are not that material. If someone asked me about deposit rates, I wouldn't have thought of Raisin.
I would say to check askaboutmoney to see what rates were available. But I would seriously question whether having large sums on deposit and fixed for 5 years was a good idea.
For this particular article, the journalist seems to have checked Bonkers and spoken to a few people. Maybe they didn't talk about Raisin to him? In any event, it is certainly not a rehash of a press release.
Brendan
Who isn't, but I bet you can't come up with a better alternative?You must be expecting a lot of rain.
Brendan
And I would not have any large amount of cash in a deposit for long enough to make it worthwhile shopping around.
Covered many times in many threads.Can you elaborate?
I've been looking at Raisin because there is some money I want to set aside for my son's college fund. I won't need this money for 10 years and Statesavings don't look at all attractive to me.
Maybe YOU wouldn't, but thousands of others might want to. Nothing wrong with almost €17,000.00 for 5 years if you didn't need it.I would not have €100k in a rainy day fund.
And I would not have any large amount of cash in a deposit for long enough to make it worthwhile shopping around.
Brendan
Brendan
The €17k will lose significant value due to inflation over the five years. Keeping large amounts of cash on deposit or in deposit style products is generally not a good idea or an optimal investment strategy. As I said, this has been covered many many times in many many other threads.Maybe YOU wouldn't, but thousands of others might want to. Nothing wrong with almost €17,000.00 for 5 years if you didn't need it.
Total non sequitur.I bet you the paper billionaire Sean Quinn would agree with me right now.
Don't want to get into a this and that scenario. We all know about inflation as of now, not a years time or whatever. Have you got a guaranteed better option? As for your Latin? Nonne mirabilis es?The €17k will lose significant value due to inflation over the five years. Keeping large amounts of cash on deposit or in deposit style products is generally not a good idea or an optimal investment strategy. As I said, this has been covered many many times in many many other threads.
Total non sequitur.
Not guaranteed, no. But there are alternatives that will very likely provide better (than negative) returns over 5 years. The big issue here is that many people just assume/believe that cash savings/deposits are safe and no risk and that the nominal value of their money is the most important thing. This is flawed thinking that leads to suboptimal returns or, worse still, erosion of capital value. All investments involve some risk/reward. Cash deposits included.Have you got a guaranteed better option?
I never said anything about having 100k in a rainy day fund.I would not have €100k in a rainy day fund.
And I would not have any large amount of cash in a deposit for long enough to make it worthwhile shopping around.
Brendan
Brendan
As a matter of curiosity, how would you quantify “very likely”?Not guaranteed, no. But there are alternatives that will very likely provide better (than negative) returns over 5 years.
I've been looking at Raisin because there is some money I want to set aside for my son's college fund. I won't need this money for 10 years and Statesavings don't look at all attractive to me.
That depends totally on your level of risk aversion and to some extent your tax bracket.But if you are still worried long-term investments like that should be in equities or an equity-based product.
For many individuals, putting some of their net wealth into a deposit account may make sense. They may already have paid off their mortgage, maxed their pension, have a sufficient rain day fund etc etc. They may be happy to put it away for 1 or even 3 years.The answer to that is to overpay your mortgage instead of putting it on deposit
And a pertinent point is that no deposit product is risk free. And that's not even considering the opportunity cost/risk of not putting the capital to work better elsewhere."What's the best risk-free bank deposit for an Irish resident?" is a fair question.
<=€100k is indeed risk free per person per institution.And a pertinent point is that no deposit product is risk free.
I agree. But sometimes people know what product they want and want to know the best one.This is why individual money makeover analyses are so much better than "what is the best X product?" questions.
Well, there is always a possibility (albeit very remote) that a national deposit guarantee scheme will be insufficient to meet all claims where an institution fails.<=€100k is indeed risk free per person per institution.
Well, there is always a possibility (albeit very remote) that a national deposit guarantee scheme will be insufficient to meet all claims where an institution fails.
AFAIK national guarantee schemes only maintain reserves equivalent to 0.8% of covered deposits.
Perhaps it would be better to describe covered deposits as very low risk, as opposed to risk free.
The bank recovery and resolution framework is very advanced in Europe since the bailouts of 2008-09 and there are large deposit guarantee schemes at national and EU level. Banks also have to keep greater levels of liabilities that can be bailed in before retail depositors <€100k would be touched.Perhaps it would be better to describe covered deposits as very low risk, as opposed to risk free.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?