ubiquitous
Registered User
- Messages
- 3,782
ubiquitous said:As I mentioned above, I am intrigued by your admission that you intend to campaign for FF and for a change of government, at the next election. Do you want to explain this apparent contradiction?
Bad example - the answer is most definitely yes! 10 months in living in Longford were the longest 10 months of my life!!ubiquitous said:Is Dublin really twice or 2.5 times a better place to live in than Longford.
Cunning analysisCCOVICH said:In theory, if FF were to achieve an outright majority and could form a government without having to get back into bed with the PDs, then this would constitue a change in government? (and of course if FF were in government on their own all our problems would be solved)
This is ridiculous! How can you have a quantitative comparative multiplier on a qualitative factor?
Is Dublin really twice or 2.5 times a better place to live in than Longford. Is Ailesbury Road 10 times a better place to live in than Blanchardstown. Or is it 20 times?
Cunning analysis- except that it doesn't explain daltonr's contradictory comments [broken link removed] about getting FF out of Government while also canvassing on behalf of one of their candidates whom "he likes".
Moving the goalposts yet again, eh?I'd like to see FF out of governement. It would be a step in the right direction. But more importantly I'd like to see good TD's in the Dail. I don't think FG or Labour will be sufficient better that it's FF out at ALL COSTS.
ClubMan said:Doesn't the Luas have P&R facilities?
Moving the goalposts yet again, eh?
Your earlier explanation of how you want to get FF out but will still canvass on behalf of and vote for one of their candidates simply does not add up and this is why people continue to question you on it. I guess that there simple is no reasonable explanation so?
RainyDay said:They will only continue to drive into the city centre or park in residential areas if they refuse to accept the revolutionary option of walking to/from the bus stop.
You keep adding qualifiers and caveats to your explanations as to why you will support a representative of a party whom you think need to be removed from Government so it does seem like you are shifting the goalposts to me. There is nothing for me to get over other than your ability to contradict yourself without being able to accept that you are doing so.daltonr said:For goodness sake clubman will you get over it. There hasn't been movement of goal posts or anything else. This is exactly what I was saying earlier on this thread, and what I've consistently said for as long as I've been posting on AAM.
Even with PR is makes no sense to give even a low preference vote to somebody that you do not support. Your ongoing vilification of the current Government and, in particular, FF, and attribution of most or all of the blame for the causes/symptoms of so called "rip-off Ireland" to them simply does not make any sense in the context of your stated intention to canvass on behalf of and vote for one of their representatives. This is not a misprepresentation of your comments by the way.And there was me thinking PR allowed for such strategies.
to canvass on behalf of and vote for one of their representatives. This is not a misprepresentation of your comments by the way.
You keep adding qualifiers and caveats to your explanations
For somebody who regularly accuses me of engaging in semantics you're doing a good job of doing the same thing in attempting to draw some subtle distinction between "campaigning on behalf of" and "campaigning for" and not joining a team but offering your services...daltonr said:I never said I'd join his canvassing team. I will CAMPAIGN for him, i.e. in the run up to the election I'll certainly offer my services to help out. And I'll ask people I know to give him a vote. I certainly won't ask people to continue their preference for other FF candidates and I'm sure Mr McGuinness would be asking them to do.
I don't agree with your analysis because it is still the case that none of this in any way makes sense of campaigning and voting for a member of a party whom you have stated need to be removed from Government.FF will only be out of government for one term regardless. FG Labour are at best a protest government. I'd like to think that by supporting the good candidates in a bad party that by the tiem FF regains power they may have made some slight move in the direction advocated by a few in their ranks.
If you don't agree with my analysis that's fine. If FF get kicked out of government, but one or two of their members that I'd consider good manage to hold their seats, that will be the best election result I could hope for. And I think we all have the right to vote for the election result we'd like.
No - just making a logical, consistent and non contradictory argument will do rather than trying to cover your tracks with incremental caveats and disclaimers when you have been found out making contradictory claims.I'm sorry. In future when I offer an opinion I'll provide a few pages of background to ensure that every possible detail relating to the opinion is fully thrashed out so there are no suprises for you.
But since you have used the phrase "ripped off the public for decades" perhaps you could elaborate on how in your opinion that was the case, since as far as I can see it's the first time a mod has acknowledged the valididy of claiming there was any sort of Rip-off in Ireland.
For somebody who regularly accuses me of engaging in semantics you're doing a good job of doing the same thing in attempting to draw some subtle distinction between "campaigning on behalf of" and "campaigning for" and not joining a team but offering your services...
I don't agree with your analysis because it is still the case that none of this in any way makes sense of campaigning and voting for a member of a party whom you have stated need to be removed from Government.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?