daltonr said:> As I outlined here and in subsequent posts in the same thread I dispute the
> claim that we don't live in a low tax economy.
I accept you dispute it and I'll agree to differ if you will
>I made two suggestions for where c. €10 meals can be had
Yeah - lunch. There is also good value to be had in early bird dinner menus too. When I get a chance I may collate some good offers. I take it from the Florida invitation that you've decided on Canada or Oz?here in case
>that helps.
I think your suggestions were for Lunch, not evening meals. But the info is much appreciated. I'll do my best to check them out. If you like sea-food or a really excellent homemade hamburger, and are ever in Florida let me know.
-Rd
I just thought that you might have some comment to make on the hard facts and figures that I presented in that post and the rest of that thread in relation to which I asked for somebody to point out where myself and my wife, as a not atypical couple (bar the lack of a car maybe), were being ripped off in relation to taxes, charges, expenditure etc. because we certainly can't see it. Nobody has managed to do this as far as I can see. I thought that you would be up to the challenge.
Some of them were so obvious that I had considered them alright. However some of them are not so obvious because they are based on invalid assumptions and, in my opinion, an seeming obsession with identifying negative aspects (real or imagined) of a situation rather than taking a balanced view of the facts and, only then, arriving at a logical and reasonable conclusion.daltonr said:I do have some comments. To be honest they are so obvious that I'm sure you've already considered them.
These pennies are all on paper. I'm not saying that this is insignificant or irrelevant but, in practice, it means nothing to us on a day to day basis.1. You bought your house 10 years ago and have benefited from 10 years of extraordinary house price growth. Well done. I'm sure you made sacrafices to get it, and you deserve every penny.
It has its advantages and disadvantages but ultimately the former outweight the latter in our opinion. Not everybody would agree.Your proximity to the city would have further enhanced the effect. This would certainly buy a lot of contentment.
True. But there are plenty of couples in the same situation and age bracket as us in this area and all the way heading out towards more suburban areas in all directions so we are certainly not unique or specially privileged in this respect.2. You live close to the city and close to a wide array of public transport options. You don't live where the majority of new property is being built, and where young couples are finding themselves very under served by Public transport.
I just looked up Dublin Bus and the 49/49A seem to serve Firhouse and terminate on Eden Quay which is hardly a city centre backwater.Literally last night I was discussing how one might go about getting from our house to the city center by Bus. And I live in Firhouse, not exactly a backwater. The bus route is unbelievably meandering and still involves a long walk in the city center.
Do they ever consider the impact that their parking might have on residents of the surrounding area and maybe consider alternative modes of transportation to their destination or to the bus (e.g. walk, bike, moped)? Suburban commuter parking in residential streets is one problem that we suffered from in our area for a long time (e.g. people ditching their cars in our area for the working day) and which caused major inconvenience for residents but thankfully the council have recently introduced pay and display in the area which has more or less eliminated this problem.The person in question owns a yearly bus pass, but has found that their parking spot near a QBC is no longer an option. They have to now go searching for another back street to squeeze their car into because some park and rides along the QBC is too much to ask.
I presume by "wrong side of the city" you mean that this person is destined for some Northside destination and the Luas green line termination at Stephen's Green is not convenient for them? I have regularly managed 5-10 minute walks to make connections between different public transport facilities and I'm sure that others can manage it too.When Bus Pass time comes up for review they could consider the Luas. But the Luas from here will get you to the wrong side of the city and in a stroke of genius doesn't link with the other Luas.
I don't accept that this is the case and I don't accept that this is a valid way to deal with the employer's PRSI liability. It's like saying that if 21% VAT was not charged on goods then they would simply be 21% dearer anyway. This is a fallacy in my opinion. Even if your analysis was true and the removal of employer PRSI drove wages up by 10% would you blame the inevitable consequential rise in prices and reduced level of PRSI linked welfare services on "rip-off Ireland" or on something else?3. When calculating how much tax you pay I'd add 10% of your gross to your tax bill to account for Employers PRSI. You actually pay this because your employer looks at how much you cost to employ. They'd pay you more if the government took less.
I don't know what you mean here.I think both the employers and employees cut even goes in the same payment.
You are making assumptions here about our regular destinations by drawing this conclusion. Not all of our regular travel is facilitated by public transport and arrangements can sometimes be complex. In spite of this we choose not to own and run a car because on a cost/benefit anlysis basis we simply cannot justify it. That's the key issue - it is a choice and we live with it rather than blaming somebody or something else for our lack of this modern convenience that many people (mistakenly in my opinion) consider an essential requirement.4. You are fortunate in that by your location you actually do have a realistic choice about whether or not you run a car.
I think that this is an extremely presumptuous conclusion to arrive at particularly since it is based on very incomplete information. As I have said above we are in no way unique in our immediate or wider vicinity so I don't accept that we are particularly atypical. Perhaps the problem here is that you are not willing to face the fact that many individuals and couples are in situations very similar to ourselves and that they are relatively happy with their lot and not prepared to buy into the whole "rip-off Ireland" mania (or is it depression?)?In short you are not a typical couple. You are an extraordinarily lucky couple
I presume by tax breaks for people who already have houses you mean the ability of investors to write off 100% of mortgage interest and other allowable expenses against rental income? If this is the case they you also have to accept that these people will pay higher rates of stamp duty on the purchase and will pay CGT on the resale gain whereas owner occupiers in general, and first time buyers in particular, will generally pay lower CGT (if any) and no CGT on any resale gain. And they get mortgage interest relief with first time buyers getting preferential rates compared to non FTBs. And don't forget that owner occupiers can earn up to €7,620 in rent a room rental totally free of tax and PRSI. Given these tax breaks for first time buyers and other owner occupiers where do you see the "rip-off"?I think there is a big and growing chunk of the Irish Population who have it much worse than you. Remember when we used to hear about the high percentage of Irish people under the age of 25. Well. They've grown up and they want a house.
And when they try to buy a house they find the government giving tax breaks to people who already have houses, to buy more. Their tax that they pay is subsidising people who already have houses, to out bid them when they try to buy their first house.
These pennies are all on paper. I'm not saying that this is insignificant or irrelevant but, in practice, it means nothing to us on a day to day basis.
True. But there are plenty of couples in the same situation and age bracket as us in this area and all the way heading out towards more suburban areas in all directions so we are certainly not unique or specially privileged in this respect.
I just looked up Dublin Bus and the 49/49A seem to serve Firhouse and terminate on Eden Quay which is hardly a city centre backwater.
Do they ever consider the impact that their parking might have on residents of the surrounding area and maybe consider alternative modes of transportation to their destination or to the bus
Suburban commuter parking in residential streets is one problem that we suffered from in our area for a long time (e.g. people ditching their cars in our area for the working day) and which caused major inconvenience for residents but thankfully the council have recently introduced pay and display in the area which has more or less eliminated this problem.
I presume by "wrong side of the city" you mean that this person is destined for some Northside destination and the Luas green line termination at Stephen's Green is not convenient for them?
Even if your analysis was true and the removal of employer PRSI drove wages up by 10% would you blame the inevitable consequential rise in prices and reduced level of PRSI linked welfare services on "rip-off Ireland" or on something else?
You are making assumptions here about our regular destinations by drawing this conclusion. Not all of our regular travel is facilitated by public transport and arrangements can sometimes be complex. In spite of this we choose not to own and run a car because on a cost/benefit anlysis basis we simply cannot justify it. That's the key issue - it is a choice and we live with it rather than blaming somebody or something else for our lack of this modern convenience that many people (mistakenly in my opinion) consider an essential requirement.
I think that this is an extremely presumptuous conclusion to arrive at particularly since it is based on very incomplete information. As I have said above we are in no way unique in our immediate or wider vicinity so I don't accept that we are particularly atypical. Perhaps the problem here is that you are not willing to face the fact that many individuals and couples are in situations very similar to ourselves and that they are relatively happy with their lot and not prepared to buy into the whole "rip-off Ireland" mania (or is it depression?)?
I presume by tax breaks for people who already have houses you mean the ability of investors to write off 100% of mortgage interest and other allowable expenses against rental income?
Given these tax breaks for first time buyers and other owner occupiers where do you see the "rip-off"?
Replaced by Rose of Tralee
Why not ask them?daltonr said:Since 51.5% of people watching TV seem to like Eddie's show, why don't they replace whatever is on the other channel. No offence to Lost Fans.
Did you write to them or email them? In general with large organisations I find that the former is more likely to elicit a response than the latter.daltonr said:I asked them a similar question a few years ago and didn't get a reply.
The answer to your question is that we're a restless bunch always striving for better.
at least that's the marketing spin on it.
Yes, but when people are very negative all the time it can be soul destroying for those who have to listen to the message and rather than winning converts, one tends to lose respect for the perhaps well-intentioned messenger.
daltonr said:This thread isn't going to get any further.
Who are the happy clappy brigade? Are you referring to people who point out flaws in the whole "rip-off Ireland" argument and rebut some of the more sweeping generalisations in this context? Obviously nobody forces you to read what they write either.daltonr said:I wasn't aware that anyone was oblighed to read this stuff. And I have to say that the happy clappy brigade who tell us all that we should be changing our lifestyle to be more like them is just as annoying as anything I've written.
I presume that this is in reference to my earlier posts. Just to clarify I was not "confused" about the cost of running a car. I simply said that I was not au fait with all the costs involved since I don't run one myself. Not exactly the same thing. Neither did I suggest that somebody who needs or wants to run a car should get rid of it. Desisting from inaccurately representing the views and comments of others would improve the chances of discussions such as this actually being constructive.Of course someone living close to the city center surrounded by public transport options is going to be confused when people talk about the cost of running a car. Of course they'll wonder why we don't all do what they do and get rid of our cars.
I asked you before which political party or movement would do a better job that the current Government but I don't think that you got around to answering. Maybe you could comment now? By the way I have no party political affiliations or allegiances myself just in case there is any confusion about that.It is valid to point out that when the government claims to be concerned about Inflation, House Prices, etc, etc, etc, that the government is the main cause of these things, so people don't make the mistake of voting for these people next time.
Do you respect Michael McDowell for commenting [broken link removed] that he didn't agree with the whole idea of equality in society and that things should be run on meritocratic lines?I wouldn't mind if the government said, House Price Inflation and General Inflation are necessary, it's part of our plan, but the policies will benefit us all long term. I might disagree with their policies, but I'd respect their honesty. It's the lying and hypocrisy that gets me.
Doesn't the Luas have P&R facilities? Not sure about the DART and other rail services.It is valid to point out that we build QBC's but don't bother with Park and Rides and peopleare going to continue to drive into the city center, or park in residential areas.
Yes - some pubs, supermarkets etc. have high prices. Some do not. Just this morning on the way into work I noticed that a local butcher was offering 10 chicken breasts for €7 and I bought 10 apples and 1KG of grapes in Moore Street for €1 each. Last week I bought six cans of Bavaria lager for €7 (€1.17 each) and on Saturday I bought two cans of lager for €1.15 each and two cans of Bass for €1.05 each. All of these items would have cost a lot more from other sources. A few small examples but I could provide many more.It is valid to point out that high prices in Pubs, Supermarkets, Electronics stores, Restraurants, are high for a reason and it's not all explained by the fact that we have jobs and disposable income.
Yes - good and bad. Many of the rip-off Ireland merchants seem to focus only on the latter.Finally and most importantly it is valid to constantly compare ourselves Good and Bad to other countries to see how we stack up. Just as we're advices to compare pubs, restaurants etc. It is valid to shop around for countries. What are other countries doing better, or worse than us.
Following on from my previous point I posted some details such as this simply to balance your seeming bias towards accentuating the negative things in Ireland compared to other countries.What we get on here is that if you point out something better about another country you get .... "Yeah but they have the Death Penalty", or "Yeah but their literacy rate is 5% lower than ours".
So what? Do you think that everybody has an automatic and inalienable right to live where they want regardless of market forces and supply and demand constraints? If so, why? As for first time buyers being "squeezed" how do you explain the results of a recent [broken link removed] which found that 44% of first time buyers surveyed claimed that their mortgage repayments were "no burden at all", 49% said that they were "somewhat of a burden" and only 6.5% said that they were a "heavy burden".The typical Dublin house buyer today is squeezed out to areas like Firhouse and Lucan. Four out of five first time buyers buy outside Dublin even though 29% of the population live there.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?