In the Christmas season and all, all I can say is "Ho ho ho"... I got a great laugh out of some of these comments. I'd be with CCOVICH on closing this thread because we're going to get into all the same old arguements we had last August. But since it's not closed yet, and we're going to our own Christmas party tonight, I'm free for a while, so here goes.
Kelmar said:
"rip-off definition
noun {C usually singular}
something that is not worth what you pay for it:"
Two can play that game. Here's a definition I found elsewhere.
Noun: (n) heist, rip-off (the act of stealing)
So, if the bar/restaurant or the taxi company has stolen from you or anyone from your company, please report this immediately to the Gardai. Stealing is an offence, and therefore the perpretrators should be arrested, charged and banged away in a "stasiland" prison.
Lauren said:
I'd suggest that is has more to do with Christmas than it has to do with Ireland
I'm with you on this one Lauren. I've had a recent experience where a very well known and highly recommended restaurant in Ballsbridge hosted 12 of us for a night out last week. The food was ordinary at best, as was the service. And we were literally booted out the door at 9pm.
I'm told that this is not the usual for this place, but they obviously decided to churn faster to make more money over Christmas.
It wasn't a "rip off" though. It was very poor value for money, and poor service.
tiger said:
For me, ripoff equals any off:
- bad value for money
- sub-standard service
- bad customer service
So in my the Kelmar was ripped off.
Bad value is bad value. If the had steak for €10 on the menu, and charged you €25 on the bill, then that would be a rip-off. But didn't happen in this case, so it was just bad value.
Sub-standard service, and bad customer service are one and the same thing, and aren't a rip-off either. It's just exactly what you say they are - Sub-standard service, and bad customer service.
You could get Sub-standard service, and bad customer service, in a situation where you're not actually paying for the service in the first place, but you wouldn't describe that as a rip-off.
tiger said:
Also, the usual "anti rip-off" argument of "you chose to spend" doesn't apply, as clearly they weren't in a position to walk away.
A business that imprisons customers and makes them stay and buy drinks and forces them to endure their service. Wow, think you may have a scoop here for the newspapers.
You always have the option to leave and say "thanks, but no thanks".
onekeano said:
Have to say this is the greatest load of [expletive deleted]. So, now we are encouraging sharp practice once it's technically legal? And in addition to this we are supposed to sit under the price lists to check before buying each drink if they had been "updated".
I never said it was okay, or technically legal, or should be encouraged. I said that if they did this, it WAS legal. I never said anything about the "moral" rights and wrongs about it.
If you have a problem with what they did by increasing the prices, then yes, I suggest you do sit under the price list and see if they update them.
Chances are that they didn't change them, and hence broke the law. If they'd checked this out, they could have reported them to ODCA and at least gotten a little "Stasiland" satisfaction out of the whole thing by having them fined and punished for it.
onekeano said:
If it looks like a Ripoff and sounds like a Ripoff chances are IT IS A RIPOFF!
If a "rip-off" happens in a bar/restaurant that has no customers because everyone knows how the bar/restaurant operates and no-one goes there, is it still a "rip-off"????
onekeano said:
Good man Clubman for accepting Kellmars point regarding the swizz / rip off. Personally when I go to a bar it's usually for a drink - not to "apprise" myself!!!
Sounds like the fun is going out of it when you have to start making informed decisions based on "normal" prices?
It's unfortunate that in the Ireland of today that it's mostly an attitude like this that has places such as the bar/restaurant mentioned above being able to get away with the "sharp practices" that they engage in.
Because people don't really care (in the most part) about places doing such things, they never complain, and never avoid the places in the future.
If everyone was as upset about the actions of this place as the OP, and they all refused to go back, maybe then the owners might realise that they can't get away with this stuff because customers are more aware, and that they "apprise" themselves better before spending their hard earned money.