Revenue solicitor charging VAT

W

WizardDr

Registered User
Messages
1,589
Is anybody aware that the Revenue Solicitor appears to charge VAT in Court Cases where they are seeking their costs.

Can this be correct?
 
Well what it would mean is that they could then charge out the Inspector etc etc ..as in they are 'staff' and not a 'law firm'..

does anybody have a technical view that allows the Revenue to do this?
 
WizardDr said:
Well what it would mean is that they could then charge out the Inspector etc etc ..as in they are 'staff' and not a 'law firm'..

does anybody have a technical view that allows the Revenue to do this?
Click to expand...

It's the activity that determines whether a transaction is VATable, not the person providing it. The Revenue solicitors are solicitors, they don't charge in costs for the time spent on a case by the Inspector, they are charging for the legal services they have provided in dealing with the case. (If they were to charge for the time of the other Revenue staff, you'd be seeing some fairly hefty costs!!)

The local authorities now have to charge VAT on waste collection services, just the same as a private contractor; albeit that their staff are still civil servants employed by the local authority - no difference to your scenario above really.
 
mandelbrot - a solicitor working in a company is not providing VATable services to his company so that cannot be quite the answer.

Does anybody know why Revenue Soicitors are able to charge VAT?
 
Legal services are being supplied to an Irish based customer.

VAT at the standard rate (currently 21%) should be charged.

The fact that this relates to a Revenue solicitor is a moot point.

The question is what's the service and who's the customer? The VAT treatment should then be ascertainable.
 
WizardDr said:
mandelbrot - a solicitor working in a company is not providing VATable services to his company so that cannot be quite the answer.

Does anybody know why Revenue Soicitors are able to charge VAT?
Click to expand...

Revenue don't have an in-house solicitor. They contract the function out to an external solicitors office (eg Ivor Fitzpatrick & Co is one such firm AFAIK) and that office provides Revenue with this service. The solicitor then charges their customer (ie Revenue) on a per-case basis and therefore has to charge VAT.
 
Gekko, that was really a nice informative link shared by you. I knew that all the legal services are VATable, but do not have all the information regarding this. Thanks for sharing.
 
Counsel used in Court cases would not be a Revenue employee (as all Barristers are self employed) so they would charge VAT.
 
csirl said:
Counsel used in Court cases would not be a Revenue employee (as all Barristers are self employed) so they would charge VAT.
Click to expand...

Ahhhh, yes this must be it - the Revenue solicitors aren't billing for their own costs (in the same way that the taxpayer doesn't get a bill for the time of the Inspector who came and did the audit...!), they're billing for the cost of Counsel, who obviously are charging VAT.
 
For the avoidance of doubt -- the Revenue Solicitors are EMPLOYEES of Revenue for the purposes of my query. What I want to know is where their right to charge these guys to cases (and not for example the Inspector) arises from.

Forget any other aspect.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register