Just 30 euro- I would pay up without any questions- beats having to pay 1000 + management fees in some areas...
. Management fees cover block insurance, refuse, landscaping, common area maintenance...totally different responsibilities
It will be interesting to see if someone has a definitive answer on this. However, it would be unfortunate (in my opinion) if data protection wins out in this instance. All too often, a sizable minority sit back and benefit from something that others have to take the hit on. I appreciate that this thread started out on the track that some object to a RA on the basis of the objective of the RA. However, isn't it best to influence from within (seeing as you otherwise benefit from the activities of the RA ...whether you see it that way or not)?Also publishing a list of those that have paid would infer those that had not and though not a direct breach of the data protection act would most possibly be still a breach through that inference, i.e. you publish data that can be used to identify those that had not paid
thats as close to definitive as you'll get, firstly by circulating teh list of who has paid you've breached the DPA secondly the inferance is most probably a breach because it clearly identifies an individual who hasnt paid. all people have to do is add 2+2However, it would be unfortunate (in my opinion) if data protection wins out in this instance.
this is true, the same can be said about those that withhold service charges in managed estatesAll too often, a sizable minority sit back and benefit from something that others have to take the hit on.
owner managed estates can also be less of a financial burden if everyone chipped in and paid up, if the directors could negotiate the agent fee and the agent actually looked for the best price instead of giving work to the same old contractors. 2 years ago my SC went up by €220 to cover a sklight increase in some costs and teh rest so insurance could be paid because a large group of pewople refused to pay. if the MC recovered this outstanding money it would equal about 50% of one years full fee its outstanding that long. so this could be used to reduce costs while still maintaing full services.i have often thought about how much more could be achieved and how much less a financial burden there would be if everyone chipped in (but that will never happen).
I see your point - but is that the way it will be seen in the eyes of the law (and the DPA)? That was the question.thats as close to definitive as you'll get, firstly by circulating the list of who has paid you've breached the DPA secondly the inferance is most probably a breach because it clearly identifies an individual who hasnt paid. all people have to do is add 2+2
Sure - agreed - 100%this is true, the same can be said about those that withhold service charges in managed estates
owner managed estates can also be less of a financial burden if everyone chipped in and paid up
A valid point. However the reality of the situation is that the Council (and particularly now in this current environment) will not be bothered either way....in which case, your estate will go to sh1t. I know many folks mentioned at the beginning of this thread that they had issues with their respective RA's as they were focused on aesthetics. However, it's very naive to underestimate the aesthetics - as thats where the downfall of the area begins. Long grass and god knows what else - and those that are seeking to rent properties will only be able to do so via a deal with Council Housing - which will lead to all types (no disrespect to the many respectable people that happen to fall into this category ...alongside the anti-social types) moving in. And the wrecking ball gathers momentum from there on in - all the other problems follow - and its next to impossible to reverse this once it's happened.but as the estate is now in the hands of the council then there is no obligation, legal or otherwise to pay, the counter arguement is "i pay my taxes, its now a council estate so the council can do it FOC coz its paid for in my taxes"
Of course, I empathise with those who fall into category 1 - but not to the extent that I wouldn't be motivated to do all I can to insure that my estate (and by inferrence - my own property) gets dragged down as a consequence. No matter what angle people approach this from (ie. the investor properties, the real home owners or those that might aspire to trading up at some stage) - they will all be affected if things go downhill. Either they won't be able to achieve quality rental, dropping standards within the estate could well have implications for those who plan to stay (for their kids in the long run - and the likelihood of theft, etc) and those who aspire to sell up at some stage (I'm sure you can see how this could affect final sales price).1) people cant pay coz they dont have it
2) people wont pay coz they are bottom feeders and expect everything for free
3) people wont pay as they see no real point, why should i when paddy up the road isnt and enjoys the same benifits
it is nice to have the grassy knolls tidy though. I did not join yet as no constitution/accountability. And people they got to do the grass did it very bad . also members do not seem to have much input and there does not seem to be much transparency. if there was i would pay to have the grassy knolls tidy/neat even though i do not use them eitherApologies for resurrecting an old thread, but this one interests me as I had a knock on the door this evening from someone from the estate's residents association asking for €80 for this year. I played temporarily broke to give myself some time to think about it.
I'm renting the property, moved in 6 weeks ago, and no one told me anything before I moved in about any extra charges. Last week my landlady tells me she's putting the house on the market, so chances are I'll have to start looking for a new house in a couple of months - maybe longer if it takes time to sell.
It's a well maintained estate of about 150 houses with a lot of green areas that need trimming. After thinking about it for some time, I'm left with a few conclusions that haven't really been raised on this thread.
- From my time living here, it seems to me that families with young kids benefit most from well maintained grass areas, as it's always the kids who use it. I have no kids or family, and never use the grass areas. The only way I benefit is in the aesthetic - isn't that a pretty garden? kind of thing, and the truth is, that just doesn't interest me.
- A well maintained estate adds or at least helps maintain property values. But I'm renting. I don't care about the value of the house I live in. I can see that the owner/landlord would benefit in that regard, but not me.
- With the house now on the market, chances are I'm a short term tenant. The livelihood and harmony of the estate are therefore not of any importance to me.
Basically, I have no intention of paying - for the reasons outlined above. If I owned the property, I probably would. If I thought I'd be here for the year, I probably would - though begrudgingly (reasons 1 and 2). And if I had young kids out playing football with the other kids, then I probably would.
Bottom line is, you can't expect the same regard for the open areas from the occupants of each property. People on this thread are assuming, incorrectly, that everyone should love and have the same regard for the grassy knolls as they do.
Surely you as a member would have just as much 'input' as all the other members? If not, then your right not to participate.members do not seem to have much input and there does not seem to be much transparency.
Everybody 'uses' them by default. If they're long and uncared for - you will see (within a fairly rapid timespan) that this will be the start of the 'rot' setting in - leading on to other issues. Having said that, I don't think anybody who is renting should have to pay.i would pay to have the grassy knolls tidy/neat even though i do not use them either
Same in our case - albeit that we changed fairly quickly to someone who could do it properly. Then again, you can only influence from the inside...And people they got to do the grass did it very bad.
which is very little so i am toldSurely you as a member would have just as much 'input' as all the other members? If not, then your right not to participate.
When you look at the modern alternitive of management companies and the outrageous charges involved you should be very grateful to have unpaid volunteers looking after your interests for a paltry 30 euro per year.
Ok - but nevertheless, each and every member has an equal say, correct?which is very little so i am told
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?