Report on the Dáil motion on the PTSB SVR

The PTSB got themselves into this mess with their own terrible commercial decisions and are not punished one bit whereas the mortgage holder who did nothing wrong has to pay for it and the Government agree that this is fair. PTSB dug the hole but
get to keep the shovel!
 
I think it's worth reproducing the relevant bits of the Labour Party TD, Colm Keaveny's contribution to the Debate

 
So I read this thread with interest, as Brendan did email me asking for my support as a suffering PTSB SVR mortgage payer. I am in Cork and up to my eyes in work, so could not attend the Dail debate, but fair play to those who did. I emailed my Labour TD but got no response - fat lot of good that did. My question is now what difference has this all made? The government amendment was carried 70 to 24, which advised no action by the government to pressure (other than by 'suasion') PTSB to reduce its SVR.

Another thread discusses the whole issue of Promisory notes and the passing of Tracker loans to IBRC or some kind of 'bad bank' which will relieve the pressure on PTSB and hopefully they will then reduce their SVR. I cant honestly see this happening within the next 12 months. The fact remains, because there is no competition in the mortgage market, PTSB can do precisely what it likes and screw its customers to its hearts content, and the government clearly see their role as a shareholder in PTSB as more important than their role to protect their citizens from rogue businesses.

So I ask again - what has changed?
 
With all their ups and more ups, my mortgage went up 28%. Over the term of the loan it will cost me another €60k. I'm being squeezed at 5.19%. What can you do?
 
So I ask again - what has changed?

Hi Oldsteel

It's hard to know.

The Dáil debate got coverage in the newspapers. The government TDs, especially the Labour Party TDs were very uncomfortable. They know it's wrong and they had to vote down the motion.

PTSB svr mortgage holders must keep the pressure on the government. It was helpful to have 13 people in the Visitors' Gallery for the debate. It would have been far better to have 130 people there.

But as pointed out, no cabinet minister was there anyway.

Brendan