H
Yes.I apologise in advance as I think that this subject might have been discussed here before but I need your advice concerning the Rent-A-Room scheme. Firstly, is the scheme still in place (I heard a rumour that it was discontinued from 1 January 2007).
You mean can you claim rent relief while your parents (?) avail of tax free income under the rent a room scheme? It seems to be a bit of a grey area. See here for example (there may be other threads on the same topic):My own situation is that I'm 27 and I'm living at home paying €350-a-month (€4200-a-year) rent.
I'd like to know if I'm entitled to reclaim this money and if so, how should I go about doing this?
Do you mean that you've yet to meet someone that used the Rent a Room Scheme?? I know plenty of people who have.Thanks ClubMan. I reckon it's a bit of a lost cause though. I'm yet to meet someone who has claimed from this scheme.
I still think this has to be unconstitutional in some way!
Artificial tax avoidance schemes such as the above have already been effectively illegal for many years.Maybe we should all swap children e.g. my neighbours child can live in my house...no tax liability and mine can live in theirs?
So? It doesn't matter a hoot whether or not this law is constitutional - at least until some citizen decides to spend tens of thousands of euro challenging it formally in the courts. I doubt if anyone is going to risk a legal bill of €50k or €100k to claim a €500 p.a. tax credit.
Willie O'Dea (yes the same Willie O'Dea) wrote an extensive and compelling article in the Sunday Press in 1986 stating his opinion that DIRT tax was unconstitutional. However DIRT is still on the statute books because its not worthwhile for anyone to spend a large sum in bringing a court case to get rid of it.
Artificial tax avoidance schemes such as the above have already been effectively illegal for many years.
Because of a glorious section in the taxes act called Section 811. Long and the short is that a transaction cannot be undertaken solely for the purposes of avoiding tax. There has to be some other reason for doing the transaction. Therefore if you were children swapping solely for the purposes of getting this credit it would fall under the section. Obviously the section is written in much more gibberish than that.Actually this was a joke but if the aforementioned children lived in the other person's house, how can that be deemed artificial tax avoidance?
But as far as I can see they can. It's just that the parent can't avail of the RaRS on the income received. Isn't it?My children don't claim rent relief at the moment, although if was allowed, and legal, I'd encourage them to! I genuinely don't see why they can't.
Maybe they will. I suspect that they won't though.I'm sure you're right but that doesn't mean people should lie down and accept it either. Maybe a large group of wealthy people will join forces and act out of principle rather than monetary gain?
But as far as I can see they can. It's just that the parent can't avail of the RaRS on the income received. Isn't it?
Maybe they will. I suspect that they won't though.
You'll have children who pay their parents 50 euro a week claiming rent relief, while the parents pay all the bills, mortgage, etc. not to even mention the communal toothpaste, washing powder, soaps, shampoos etc. and then they are expected to pay tax on the measly 50 euro!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?