I have no idea why he might do that; just as I have no idea why he has chosen to estrange himself from his family.Why would Jack renounce a windfall of several hundred thousand euros?
Would that not still mean John has to pay tax on the gift from Jack?Assuming all is fine with relationship could each Son receive their half share and then in a separate transaction 1 son gift his share to the other Son.
Well if you browse this forum you will find that estrangement rarely stops people from exercising their rights to an inheritancehave no idea why he might do that; just as I have no idea why he has chosen to estrange himself from his family.
I wouldn't know; the question was put to me by a relative, hence my post here.Well if you browse this forum you will find that estrangement rarely stops people from exercising their rights to an inheritance
Well first assuming no CAT allowances were used up then each would first apply CAT A and then second son gifts his half share and brother uses CAT B AND 3K gift allowance. This only makes sense if there was no fighting and the amounts in evolved stay inside CAT allowances.Would that not still mean John has to pay tax on the gift from Jack?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?