.....well, refused part of my application.
We live in a 3-bed semi in a 1950s estate in South Dublin.
The application was for: Single storey extension at rear, dormer extension at side and rear, attic conversion including velux rooflight to front elevation.
We were refused permission by Dun Laoghaire Rathdown CoCo for both dormers, and the Velux rooflight at the front of the house.
We were granted permission for everything else.
1. The reason we chose the architect we did is because he designed a superb extension (including side-dormer) for a house just around the corner from us.
2. The entire estate is peppered with rear dormers, some that have been granted permission by DLR CoCo., some not.
3. The entire estate is peppered with rooflights (Veluxes) on front elevations, most of which are there with permission granted by DLR CoCo. As I type, I can see a house directly opposite with three front Veluxes AND a side dormer.
..
To say that I am mystified and disillusioned is an understatement. DLR CoCo's servers and filing cabinets are stuffed with precendents for exactly what we applied for and they say no. No consultation, no compromise, no discussion. Nothing.
I've just been on the phone to three builders that we had had preliminary meetings with to tell them it's off for the forseeable future. One said that even if we had gone for a pre-planning meeting (we didn't because we weren't applying for anything they hadn't seen before) it is a lottery as to who actually considers your application subsequently. Even more extraordinary is that there is NO reference back to the pre-planning meeting by the planning officer that does consider your application.
Another builder said that rather than waste two months of the applicant's time (with a new application) for an additional couple of hundred euros in fees, they might try and get people back to work by granting permission and having the successful applicant spend a couple of hundred thousand.
We are now faced with an appeal to An Bord Pleanala - 4-8 months - and the hope that they will overturn the refusal. (Without reference to DLR CoCo's own planning precedents that would be unlikely, since the planner who considered our application didn't bother to refer to them) or a new application. Meeting them to show them printouts of successful applications on their own website is not an option - apparently, our case is now sub-judice.
If I felt that we had applied for something out of order I would have met them, but I know we didn't.
D.
We live in a 3-bed semi in a 1950s estate in South Dublin.
The application was for: Single storey extension at rear, dormer extension at side and rear, attic conversion including velux rooflight to front elevation.
We were refused permission by Dun Laoghaire Rathdown CoCo for both dormers, and the Velux rooflight at the front of the house.
We were granted permission for everything else.
1. The reason we chose the architect we did is because he designed a superb extension (including side-dormer) for a house just around the corner from us.
2. The entire estate is peppered with rear dormers, some that have been granted permission by DLR CoCo., some not.
3. The entire estate is peppered with rooflights (Veluxes) on front elevations, most of which are there with permission granted by DLR CoCo. As I type, I can see a house directly opposite with three front Veluxes AND a side dormer.
..
To say that I am mystified and disillusioned is an understatement. DLR CoCo's servers and filing cabinets are stuffed with precendents for exactly what we applied for and they say no. No consultation, no compromise, no discussion. Nothing.
I've just been on the phone to three builders that we had had preliminary meetings with to tell them it's off for the forseeable future. One said that even if we had gone for a pre-planning meeting (we didn't because we weren't applying for anything they hadn't seen before) it is a lottery as to who actually considers your application subsequently. Even more extraordinary is that there is NO reference back to the pre-planning meeting by the planning officer that does consider your application.
Another builder said that rather than waste two months of the applicant's time (with a new application) for an additional couple of hundred euros in fees, they might try and get people back to work by granting permission and having the successful applicant spend a couple of hundred thousand.
We are now faced with an appeal to An Bord Pleanala - 4-8 months - and the hope that they will overturn the refusal. (Without reference to DLR CoCo's own planning precedents that would be unlikely, since the planner who considered our application didn't bother to refer to them) or a new application. Meeting them to show them printouts of successful applications on their own website is not an option - apparently, our case is now sub-judice.
If I felt that we had applied for something out of order I would have met them, but I know we didn't.
D.
Last edited by a moderator: