T
TK Red
Guest
Hi there,
Hope someone out there might have some relevant views on this for me please!
Company has decided to shut down unit of 7 people (years of service ranging from 2 up to 11) - company has offered 5 weeks per year of completed service up to a cap of six months salary.
(Company has also stated that they are looking for an amicable split - hence the amount stated above)
now i understand that the offer is well above statutory but i cannot square off the fact that anyone who has been working in the unit less than 6 years gets a better relative severance than those working more than 6 years (in fact the longest serving member ends up with a real 2.75 week per year served against 5 week per year offering for a 4 year member)
has anyone out there heard of such a capping mechanism ?
does it appear fair and just ?
anyone got any precedents that might be relevant as an argument against accepting this deal?
any thoughts gratefully received
Hope someone out there might have some relevant views on this for me please!
Company has decided to shut down unit of 7 people (years of service ranging from 2 up to 11) - company has offered 5 weeks per year of completed service up to a cap of six months salary.
(Company has also stated that they are looking for an amicable split - hence the amount stated above)
now i understand that the offer is well above statutory but i cannot square off the fact that anyone who has been working in the unit less than 6 years gets a better relative severance than those working more than 6 years (in fact the longest serving member ends up with a real 2.75 week per year served against 5 week per year offering for a 4 year member)
has anyone out there heard of such a capping mechanism ?
does it appear fair and just ?
anyone got any precedents that might be relevant as an argument against accepting this deal?
any thoughts gratefully received