truthseeker
Registered User
- Messages
- 2,577
I find a lot of women cannot take a compliment. Lets say somebody admired something they were wearing, they themselves will more than likely react with a negative reply like "oh! I dunno " or "that old thing" Its funny because unless we kind of like something we won't wear it. I possibly did that in the past too but now I say back "yes, I like this dress actually " or whatever.
Used to think she was a stunner but then I heard her talk and she ruined it.
Does she moan?
Glad to see that Truthseeker thought Cheryl Cole was too skinny on the X-factor thread.
Personally, I like real women, e.g. size 14 to 20, no enhancement surgery etc.A wonky tooth or something can sometimes add to the appeal.
Women are supposed to have 'a bit of a belly' - it's the way they are made and should be something to be proud of. Even if their 'bit of a belly' turns into 'a bit too much of a belly' so what?
I know I'm not alone in finding slightly overweight much more attractive than hipbone protruding, sunken faced skinny.
I hate this phrase of "real women" when it is applied only to women over a certain size! You don't have to be overweight to be real!
I too am 5 foot 3 in and if i was a size 14 would be overweight in my opinion.
TBH this and especially Cahir's comment of looking "obese" at the same height/size is a little alarming to me. What size do women have to be to carry off a size 14 - 6 feet? what about size 16?
Here's a question for the male participants of this thread, which might give some food for thought to the females.
Which do you think is sexier?
(1) Lady who's slightly overweight but dresses sexy, walks and carries herself with confidence and humour and generally acts like she's sex on legs.
(2) Lady who's not overweight at all and is more physically attractive, but frets endlessly in front of the mirror, will argue with a genuine compliment and insists on the light being off when you're making that sweet music.
Hasten to add that neither of the above is description of the aforementioned Mrs. V, who is probably somewhere between these two fictional extremes.
i don't think it is media "brianwashing" at all. If you look at a persons BMI (body mass index) usually if you are a size 14-16 as 5ft3in you will be classed as overweight if this size rather than if you are a smaller size. I don't think it is alarming at all. As a nation we are becoming heavier so just because more people are a size 14+ doesn't mean that they are the correct weight/size. For my weight/height I am in the normal range of the BMI index and would not be if was a few stone heavier.
Size 16 in Marilyn Monroes time is about a size 12 today http://www.snopes.com/movies/actors/mmdress.asp
And at 5ft 5" a size 12 was healthy.
This whole thing is unconfirmed either way. Maybe she wasn't a 16 but she never looked like a 12 to me.
From her vitals on the same link, she weighed up to 10 stone. By some of the above comments, I'm guessing 10 stone at 5'5" would be considered overweight by some women.
Anyway, it sounds like you are contradicting yourself a little - above you say size 14 at 5'3" is obese, yet size 12 at 5'5" is healthy?!
As a matter of interest, (Fobs & cahir) how tall would a woman have to be to look OK as a size 16 in your opinion?
Edit: oh - number one Dave...obviously.
i am no expert on this but imo most size 14-16+ women could do with losing a few pounds!
In my dreams, Kelly doesn't talk so much
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?