S
gearoidmm said:People continue to drink and drive because they don't think they are going to get caught. Anything that reduces the number of people doing it is to be welcomed as far as I'm concerned. I'm not usually one for the nanny state but people have to understand that drink-driving is socially and morally unacceptable.
gearoidmm said:For years the guards have been catching people the morning after in west limerick on their way to work on Saturday morning going to a particular factory. The absence of a law on random breath testing never stopped them from doing this before.
If there was a €20,000 fine and a min 10 years off the road I think people would get the message.
Fully agree.Seagull said:I'm in favour of random testing. The more drunk drivers taken off the road, the better.
Just because someone feels fit to drive doesn't mean that they are. .... If the alchohol is in your system, you're unfit to drive.
Seagull said:I'm in favour of random testing. The more drunk drivers taken off the road, the better.
Just because someone feels fit to drive doesn't mean that they are. The fact that you drank the vast quantities the night before doesn't make you any more sober. If the alchohol is in your system, you're unfit to drive.
Vanilla said:Should the guards have the right to randomly check our homes to prevent murder, or drug sales?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?