stanbowles
Registered User
- Messages
- 28
How does this impact SSIA accounts, where the investment was made monthly over 5 years?One issue that may (or may not) influence you in deciding to stay or switch is the deemed disposal event under the Finance Act 2006 that occurs every 8th anniversary since the inception of an investment policy. Under this the exit tax is payable on the gains of the policy even where the policy is not enchased. So in 2010, if (a) you took out a QL policy in 2003; and (b) the policy has gains, you will pay the exit tax whether you exit or remain. If you are in this situation, as you have to pay the tax anyway, you it may (or may not) influence your decision to stay with QL. [Disclaimer: The above is comment / observation and is not a recommendation to follow any particular investment strategy or to buy / not buy any particular fund or stock.]
I think the idea that you pay tax on a gain and not on a loss. I'm not an expert on the Finance Act, so you would need to check out both the 2006 Finance Act and also the Finance Act 2008 that amended the 2006 Act on how the gains are calculated.Is it a deemed disposal if prices have fallen? Brendan
As was mentioned in another thread, investments held in investment houses that go under are protected under the Investment Compensation Scheme up to 90% of the value of the investment subject to a 20k maximum.
That doesn't help much in the cases of larger sums of money so if that includes you then perhaps there is reason to be worried. I am in a similar situation and am considering my options. The problem is that if your investments are in negative territory (and most are given the performance of the markets over the last couple of years) then by withdrawing them now and re-investing some place else you are increasing your tax liability to taxes on gains (28% i think). In other words you can't 'transfer' your loss into a new investment and will be immediately taxed on gains.
That said, QL and various other independent sources have said that the investment side of Quinn's business is not exposed at all to the mess with the Anglo loans and the insurance business. I'm sure this also would have been considered by the Regulator when the decision to appoint administrators was made.
All in all, I think investments with QL are probably okay, but it may be worth thinking of reducing them to round about the 20k mark to be on the safe side.
I think the idea that you pay tax on a gain and not on a loss. I'm not an expert on the Finance Act, so you would need to check out both the 2006 Finance Act and also the Finance Act 2008 that amended the 2006 Act on how the gains are calculated.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?