I was almost certain there was an option to use the average cost basis in calculating the gain / loss in the first place, but it's a long time since I looked at it.That's my understanding and seems to be supported by @jpd 's link.
In this thread from a couple of years ago a similar discussion happened where @RedOnion brought up the averaged cost basis when disposing of an ETF, which in effect offsets losses for you, and you seemed to agree at the time that offsetting was possible? https://www.askaboutmoney.com/threads/etf-returns-irish-taxation.216738/post-1664956
They say FIFO, but maybe there is negotiating room for manoeuvreI was almost certain there was an option to use the average cost basis in calculating the gain / loss in the first place, but it's a long time since I looked at it.
This advice from Standard Life says losses can be offset within the same ETF.
Where does it say/advise that?
Yes, within the same UCITS.
A standalone ETF is a collective investment in its own right, it doesn't need to be part of another collective investment to offset losses within itself.The general thrust of this thread is about stand alone ETFs but I may be misinterpreting the context of why you're including the information here.
Yes, people are mixing-up investment bonds via life companies, where the tax is at policy level, and individual ETFs dealt on exchanges. Same 41% tax rate and broadly the same rules, but very different.One of the advantages of collective investments / unit linked funds is that you a gain on one fund/ETFs can be offset against a loss on another within the same product. Eg. 50 % in managed fund, 20% global index tracker 20% commercial property trust 10% global energy/metals ETF.
The general thrust of this thread is about stand alone ETFs but I may be misinterpreting the context of why you're including the information here.
Standard Life are in the collective investment space not the individual ETF platform space.
From the same link:In fact, somewhere in the back of my mind I think you can offset losses and gains within the same overall umbrella structure.
The part I quoted is about individual ETFs, not investment bonds.Yes, people are mixing-up investment bonds via life companies, where the tax is at policy level, and individual ETFs dealt on exchanges. Same 41% tax rate and broadly the same rules, but very different.
Do you have any confirmation of this in the tax code or on the Revenue site by any chance? There are replies in this thread with contradictory views on this point, but all written with conviction and authority so it's impossible to know which one is correctYou can offset losses within the same ETF (i.e. You buy the same ETF in January at 10 and March at 20 and sell in May at 15, you can offset March losses against Jan).
Part 27-04-01 (https://www.revenue.ie/en/tax-profe...ains-tax-corporation-tax/part-27/27-04-01.pdf) says this -There isn't, but there's nowhere in the tax code or Revenue site that says two units of the same ETF must be treated as separate investments either. The only place I've seen that view is on here and on Reddit.
Did you ever get a response from Revenue about that?I have sent Revenue a message to ask myself FWIW.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?