Question: Declaration of Trust for Sole Beneficial Ownership and Tax Liability in Ireland

Hello, I’m hoping to get some thoughts on a property law and tax issue in Ireland before discussing with a solicitor. This might be considered a tax question however Declaration of Trust & Beneficial Ownership are based in law hence posting here.

If two legal owners of a property set up a Declaration of Trust where one of the owners will be the sole beneficial owner for tax purposes (i.e., receiving all rental income and being solely taxed on it), would this structure be compliant with revenue or might they have issues with it?

It seems to be more commonly done in the UK, but I’ve included the link below from Irish Legal Guide. Any thoughts on the practicalities, compliance with Revenue, and potential issues (e.g., Capital Gains Tax or anti-avoidance provisions) would be greatly appreciated.

Thesearcher said:

If two legal owners of a property set up a Declaration of Trust where one of the owners will be the sole beneficial owner for tax purposes (i.e., receiving all rental income and being solely taxed on it), would this structure be compliant with revenue or might they have issues with it?

Click to expand...

This sounds like a question way above the scope of an online discussion forum.

You probably need to engage a tax consultant, to see if all this will work, before going near a solicitor, to put it in place.

Prefaced by saying IANAL, but I am a tax person.

If I understand correctly, you have a situation where two people jointly own (legally and beneficially) a property, and one of them wants to assign their beneficial ownership to the other, without transferring their legal ownership?

I presume there's no legal impediment to doing this, but for tax purposes there will be a disposal of the beneficial interest in the property, with exposure to:

• CGT on the disposal of a party's interest in a property (based on market value if the parties are connected or the transaction is otherwise not undertaken at arm's length)
• CAT, to the extent that the consideration for the transfer is less than the market value of the interest passing
• stamp duty (I presume), if there is a written deed effecting the transfer

T McGibney said:

This sounds like a question way above the scope of an online discussion forum.

You probably need to engage a tax consultant, to see if all this will work, before going near a solicitor, to put it in place.

Click to expand...

You are right, but good to get a general idea of it with different peoples views otherwise we're going in blind - hence the post. Thanks for responding

torblednam said:

Prefaced by saying IANAL, but I am a tax person.

If I understand correctly, you have a situation where two people jointly own (legally and beneficially) a property, and one of them wants to assign their beneficial ownership to the other, without transferring their legal ownership?

I presume there's no legal impediment to doing this, but for tax purposes there will be a disposal of the beneficial interest in the property, with exposure to:

• CGT on the disposal of a party's interest in a property (based on market value if the parties are connected or the transaction is otherwise not undertaken at arm's length)
• CAT, to the extent that the consideration for the transfer is less than the market value of the interest passing
• stamp duty (I presume), if there is a written deed effecting the transfer

Click to expand...

Thanks Torblednam

CGT: If the property was recently purchased and there’s no gain or loss in value, it may not trigger CGT, but the transfer is still considered a disposal for tax purposes?

CAT: I assume CAT applies regardless of consideration, as it involves a transfer of beneficial ownership. Stamp duty would apply to the portion of the beneficial interest being transferred.

Warrants consultation with a tax accountant but good to get views on it

Thanks again

Thesearcher said:

You are right, but good to get a general idea of it with different peoples views otherwise we're going in blind - hence the post. Thanks for responding

Click to expand...

But you are going in blind. There may be an easier way to achieve your ultimate objective but high-level consultants rarely dispense highly technical advice in public and for free.

T McGibney said:

But you are going in blind. There may be an easier way to achieve your ultimate objective but high-level consultants rarely dispense highly technical advice in public and for free.

Click to expand...

Thanks, I get it and appreciated what you are saying. I like to research and asked questions first before meeting a professional so that I have at least a general idea and a handful of questions (right or wrong) that may help in a meeting.