You need to break down the fee into what the architect is charging and what the project manager is charging. LowCo2design makes a lot of valid points re the hourly charge.
Re the Architect:
Have you appointed the Architect using the approved RIAI form of appointment? If so, read this form and that will outline what are getting in terms of service.
The whole 'project manager' thing gets on my nerves sometimes. Does he/she have any actual project management qualifications? Are you sure that they are doing anything more than asking a few of their buddies for quotes for the various packages of work? And what guarantees will you recieve at the end with regard to the quality of the finished building?
A self styled 'Project Manager' does not need to have any qualifications or skills in thier role, as the title is not legally protected.
A lot of PM fees equate pretty closely to what a contractor will charge as 'profit' to manage a job on site in any case (they are in effect taking the place of the main contractor, but perhaps with a lot less responsibility).
The Architect - Contractor setup is in my opinion far preferable in most cases, for the following reasons:
- at least you have some comeback against the contrator (i.e. one point of responsibility),
- the Architect is independant to the contractor (is he independant from the PM? it doesn't seem so in this case),
- you will have a fixed price at the start of the project an will have some certainty in this case.
I'm sure there are qualified, experienced Project Managers around who may offer you savings compared to going down the main contractor route,but it can be pretty hard to proove this. A lot of contractors are now working to very, very tight margins.
www.studioplustwo.com