Fascinating - What profits are AIB paying their 3% increase from?The private sector pays what it is profitable to pay
How many billion did Anglo contribute to the state last year? How many billion did AIB contribute?Why oh why are these union chiefs not told that its irrelevant how much the private sector is paying or employing, it doesnt cost the state a penny, in fact it contributes to the state in taxes & PRSI.
Fascinating - What profits are AIB paying their 3% increase to?
How many billion did Anglo contribute to the state last year? How many billion did AIB contribute?
Fascinating - What profits are AIB paying their 3% increase from?
How many billion did Anglo contribute to the state last year? How many billion did AIB contribute?
How has yet another thread turned into Public Service bashing??? Is there no end to this?
Recent CSO research shows that relatively few people in the private sector have had pay cuts. Have you seen other research supporting your "a large number (far more than the entire civil service) are effected by a 10%+ paycut" claim?point 2 is selective as these companies number but 2 among the thousands of companies in Ireland that employ people, a large number (far more than the entire civil service) are effected by a 10%+ paycut if they still have a job at all. You just dont hear the media harp about these people on a daily basis. I guess there is no one or two people like these union leaders who can be a voice for the majority, or to give sound bite interviews to a lazy media.
Recent CSO research shows that relatively few people in the private sector have had pay cuts. Have you seen other research supporting your "a large number (far more than the entire civil service) are effected by a 10%+ paycut" claim?
Well the 400,000 on the dole at the moment are more than the entire 300,000 in the PS. Many of these lost their jobs this year equating to a 100% cut!
Also, Public Servants have taken pay cuts but must still work the same amount of hours. Where Private Sector workers have taken pay cuts it's usually for reduced hours. I realise it's involuntary and financially as hard a hit but it's still reduced pay for reduced hours.
Private sector has taken a mainly cut jobs approach, public sector has taken a cut pay approach. It seems like both public and private sector have taken equal amounts of pain to date.
Also, Public Servants have taken pay cuts but must still work the same amount of hours. Where Private Sector workers have taken pay cuts it's usually for reduced hours. I realise it's involuntary and financially as hard a hit but it's still reduced pay for reduced hours
I'm not 'having a go' , I'm just responding to a part of your previous post where you stated that the CSO wouldn't pick up on workers who were on reduced hours. That was an important point that you made, but it was also important to point out that it wasn't that simple.
Anyway, this seems to be sliding back to a public-v-private row.
Where are your getting info from. Its amazingly selective. The private sector is getting both jobs losses and paycuts, up to 25% in some instances. The public sector were asked to pay for their own pensions with not a single job axed yet!. As much as the unions spin this it's not a paycut. Again to that second posters point, ordinary worker people who have to pay for their own faltering pensions will never be convinced that PS workers beens asked to contribute to their 'guaranteed' pension is anything close to a paycut. And where are you getting the private sector paycut is mostly reduced hours. Not the reality by a country mile! It's because PS are so removed from the reality of most Irish people with these kind of asumptions that makes people so angry. We even have union leaders coming out and saying this should be addressed through work practises.. What to hell was benchmarking about?? Why cant benchmarking go the other way?? Unions for years harped on about inflation, now that we have deflation they dont want want to know. As for complainers CSO figures these do not reflect (at the CSO's own admission) the declining reality of like with like. They were a limp attempt to try and put credence to some claims. As the say you can prove with physics that an elephant can fir through the eye of an needle but the reality is simply different. The ESRI figures were more acurate and even ventured on the conservative side as it didn't fully factor the guaranteed pension return and job security.
Its no wonder people are so angry.
It's not public service bashing it's just not fair on the rest of the population to prop up this nonsense when the country cant afford it.
You can shout and scream all you like, but the facts show that the contraction of the economy will be a single figure percentage, probably in the 5-8% range. Like it or not, this means that the average person in Ireland will be 5-8% poorer - not anything close to the 25% figures that you are quoting.
Where are your getting info from. Its amazingly selective. The private sector is getting both jobs losses and paycuts, up to 25% in some instances. The public sector were asked to pay for their own pensions with not a single job axed yet!. As much as the unions spin this it's not a paycut. Again to that second posters point, ordinary worker people who have to pay for their own faltering pensions will never be convinced that PS workers beens asked to contribute to their 'guaranteed' pension is anything close to a paycut. And where are you getting the private sector paycut is mostly reduced hours. Not the reality by a country mile! It's because PS are so removed from the reality of most Irish people with these kind of asumptions that makes people so angry. We even have union leaders coming out and saying this should be addressed through work practises.. What to hell was benchmarking about?? Why cant benchmarking go the other way?? Unions for years harped on about inflation, now that we have deflation they dont want want to know. As for complainers CSO figures these do not reflect (at the CSO's own admission) the declining reality of like with like. They were a limp attempt to try and put credence to some claims. As the say you can prove with physics that an elephant can fir through the eye of an needle but the reality is simply different. The ESRI figures were more acurate and even ventured on the conservative side as it didn't fully factor the guaranteed pension return and job security.
Its no wonder people are so angry.
It's not public service bashing it's just not fair on the rest of the population to prop up this nonsense when the country cant afford it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?