All employees pay Class A PRSI. That does not make them eligible for the State pension at 60 - or a Supplementary Pension in lieu of it.No Class A paid more than class D. So how can you say we didn't contribute to the Supplementary pension!
Because it's not an unconditional payment. It's a payment conditional on you not taking employment between retirement and before 65.How can a pension prohibit people from taking up employment?
No Class A paid more than class D. So how can you say we didn't contribute to the Supplementary pension!
Class A paid more class A and we get a much reduced pension. So how can it be we didn't contribute to the Supplementary, why if we didn't contribute are we getting a pension.
This was just some crazy scheme to avoid public sector getting the state pension. On top of their public sector pension and I can understand that, but the bit between retiring and getting the state pension.
I thought if you were class A you first of all claim jab for 9 months then supplementary pension till 65 after 65 you can work if you want to is this correct???
The rules were brought in because employees on PRSI D etc and a defined benefit pension scheme was unstainable.I actually think it is a bit discriminatory. .My friend _ same age as me but class D could retire now and claim!their pension and work another job whereas I've to wait till 65. I dont know why these rules were brought in!
It also made mobility in and out of public service much more difficult.The rules were brought in because employees on PRSI D etc and a defined benefit pension scheme was unstainable.
I actually think it is a bit discriminatory. .My friend _ same age as me but class D could retire now and claim!their pension and work another job whereas I've to wait till 65. I dont know why these rules were brought in!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?