I'm told mortgage approval in principle is what they are looking for to avoid "tyre kickers"?We are in the market for a new house. We are being asked for proof of funds as a condition of viewing properties. I understand that it could be explained by being a policy to avoid time wasters in Covid times. However telling estate agents, who are incentivised to maximise sale price, your budget seems incredibly anti-competitive and anti consumer.
What do others do to deal with this? I’m considering complaining to the CCPC, but wanted to sense check my views here with you good people.
Do you mean prove the existence and validity of all bids to the vendor or prospective purchasers / tyre kickers / nosey neighbours?How about the estate agents being made to evidence every bid on every property that they offer for sale?
Am I missing something here? I’m from England originally where chains of buyers and vendors all exchange at the same time on the same day. Otherwise you would need to rent somewhere short term and store your furniture somewhere and pay for movers twice.If they're buying in a quiet area where the vendor is happy there's any offer to buy and are willing to wait, both parties work via their solicitors to close both sales in quick succession. Some aim to close both transactions on the same day, few make that work.
In busy areas most vendors don't want to wait around what might be months for a few extra k. An approach I and many others have taken is to go back to the lenders to alter the proposal to including retaining and letting the current property. Some banks will allow a percentage of the projected rent as income. Once you buy the new house, you can then sell the old one, the bank will not care that you don't follow through and let it. You can then take the proceeds of that sale to pay down some of the new mortgage (bear in mind if fixing)). Of course this only works if you have the full deposit in savings and you're not close to the loan to income lending limits.
If you are looking to borrow close to the limits or don't have significant savings, the alternative in these areas is to sell the current house, stay with family/ friends or rent while you close on the next home. Of course there are risks to that approach too in that what you plan to be a few weeks turns into a few months or more if supply is low, and if the market is rising at any significant rate, you don't want to cash-out too long before you buy back in.
Ha! No chance. Donald Trump uses email more than an estate agent!How about the estate agents being made to evidence every bid on every property that they offer for sale?
Conveyancy goes at a snails pace. Everything to do with property takes months/ years to finalise. They're doing their best to avoid using the internet!Am I missing something here? I’m from England originally where chains of buyers and vendors all exchange at the same time on the same day. Otherwise you would need to rent somewhere short term and store your furniture somewhere and pay for movers twice.
Does it work differently in Ireland?
They USED to - but mostly don't now.It depends on the vendor and the property. Someone selling a wreck in the middle of nowhere can't be choosy. An executor might be happy to wait around and take a higher offer from someone reliant on own sale.
AFAIK Irish banks don't do bridging finance which is a big pity.
Its a symptom of the sellers market.It has 'worked' like that for years though, hence the proverbial 'property chain'.
However there appears to be a move away from that nowadays with chain free purchasers being favoured for obvious good reason.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?