Steven Barrett
Registered User
- Messages
- 5,333
But he won't have built up any cash as it has all gone into the mortgage.I disagree. Over a 20 year horizon overpaying on the mortgage will give a better expected return than investing in an equity product with fees and taxes.
OP could get into the habit of overpaying mortage by the cost of college for a few years when kids in late teens, then stop the overpayments when kids are actually in college.
It's true that you don't have a liquid asset. Once a mortgage is paid it's paid and home equity is very difficult to access in Ireland right now but that might be different in 20-odd years.But my main argument is that there will be a need for liquid assets that overpaying a mortgage doesn't provide until decades later.
You aren't the first to get married based on my financial advice. And who said romance was deadSo one thing that we've decided to do straight away is start putting the children's allowance into an index fund. @Firefly pointing out how much it amounts to even in the absence of growth was a real eye opener. It's basically invisible to me in terms of income, yet if I'm calculating right a 4% growth rate would see it worth ~€45k after 18 years. I see a Zurich estimate that the cost is €12k PA for a student living in rented accommodation so while €45k is unlikely to cover it in 18 years time but might be worth a year or two hopefully! If another little one comes along we will do the same. I'm thinking that this would be better for my partner to have in her name as she has headroom in the 20% income tax bracket and I think we're likely to end up in a fund where the gain will be taxed as income?
We're also going to take out a joint life insurance policy, although I'm still not really sure what sort of amount is advisable in general. I'll think on it some more.
We also agreed we should probably get married without further delay as well so I may have to ask @Steven Barrett to stand for me
If you're going to invest the child benefit in equities for a period of 10-15 years then you'd arguably be better off buying shares directly rather than buying into an investment fund due to the better tax treatment and lower costs of the former.
You aren't the first to get married based on my financial advice. And who said romance was dead
Index funds aren't taxed as income or under CGT, they are taxed under exit tax at 41%. If you use a company like Zurich, they will look after the tax for you and pay it to the revenue from the fund when it is due.
On life cover, just get as much as you can for your budget. If you have another kid, you will need more then than you need now. It's easier and cheaper to get one plan now rather than a smaller one now and a top up later.
On the marriage front, it's worth considering doing a quick & easy civil ceremony to be legally married, then plan whatever celebration you have down the line. You will get the benefits of the marriage immediately but if a big day out is what you want you can plan that at your leisure!
They're almost certainly all unit linked style funds subject to taxation and charges that is worse than shares.Bah, it's been a few years since I had any personal investments so I misremembered how the different taxation schemes are applied. Thanks for the tip re:Zurich - I see now from googling that a lot of companies have investment products targeted at this sort of education saving for modest investments.
True. But there's no work involved. Complete the form at the beginning and sign the direct debit. You get investment in the MSCI World Index or the like, the life company takes care of all the tax and admin for you.They're almost certainly all unit linked style funds subject to taxation and charges that is worse than shares.
Out of curiosity, how much do you diversify?I have some unit linked funds over many years myself but regret not having just invested the money directly in shares.
Out of curiosity, how much do you diversify?
I have no experience but I would have thought that having direct holdings of 50-odd shares and periodically re-balancing is a lot of work.
I don't know what you mean.Out of curiosity, how much do you diversify?
My main direct shareholdings are in Berkshire Hathaway and Markel. I let them do the diversification because I'm lazy. I am aware of the risks involved (currency, concentration in certain markets/geographic regions etc.).I have no experience but I would have thought that having direct holdings of 50-odd shares and periodically re-balancing is a lot of work.
Sorry I meant for your non-ETF portfolio.I don't know what you mean.
I don't have any ETFs.Sorry I meant for your non-ETF portfolio.
I disagree. That is an atrocious annual management charge in my opinion.There’s a 1% entry fee which is a government levy, after that it’s 1.65% a year. Not great but not atrocious.
1.65% is expensive.I disagree. That is an atrocious annual management charge in my opinion.
Are you sure about the 1% entry fee being a government levy? Do all unit linked style funds have to levy that? I wasn't aware of it but it's many years since I invested via such a fund.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?