Exactly, if, like a lot of people in the 2000-2007 time frame, borrowed most of the money (95+%) then did not replay the borrowings, they can't call the house "theirs". It's the banks house that they are living in.but i do feel if i dont pay my mortgage for 6-7 years that the bank are within their rights to take back my house - they do own in anyways!
But perhaps I got the wrong impression as I didn't see the full programme - did anyone else catch it?
'Who in their right mind would finance the family home against residential properties as a business (to rent).'
Plenty of people I would say have done that because they believed that house prices would go up indefinitely. I remember (I think) the teacher on RTE radio. You know, the one on €63,000 who mortgage part of the family home for a property in Bulgaria.
This guy was buying property as a business, the rental income seemed to be his only income. Its a well known fact that you never bring your family home anywhere near your business as it will be the first thing to go if all goes belly up!! Selfish and foolish IMO
Was it not the case that the lady who hadn't paid any of her mortgage since 2002 actually wanted to sell the property when there was enough equity in it to clear the mortgage and give her enough to get a 1/2 bed cottage was hampered in doing this by the bank not being able to locate the deeds or some such? I think that was the case.
Was it not the case that the lady who hadn't paid any of her mortgage since 2002 actually wanted to sell the property when there was enough equity in it to clear the mortgage and give her enough to get a 1/2 bed cottage was hampered in doing this by the bank not being able to locate the deeds or some such? I think that was the case.
from what i understood, she seperated from her husband back then. she told the banks she couldn't afford the mortgage on her own and wanted to sell to buy something smaller, but by the time the land registry sorted the title deeds out for her, the bank had slapped on mutlple late fees etc and it all snowballed from there..sounded to me like the banks were not very flexible in working with her to resolve the situation.
I totally agree it's not only selfish and foolish but madness as well. I'm afraid a lot of people re-mortgaged to get into the property game. Didn't even the big developers offer their own homes as security?
There's nothing worst then the madness of crowds.
It's the people who take these kind of risks who have paid for my comfortable lifestyle growing up and now pay my wages. Yes, the consequences are rough if it all goes wrong but often these kind of businesses will involve the wife/partner as a co-director so it's not done behind their back. One thing's for sure with the house on the line, the business won't go without a massive fight.
... I agree that this guy seems particularly reckless ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?