truthseeker
Registered User
- Messages
- 2,577
I can't give you a concise definitive answer to that question, which is probably why you pose it but I suspect that if the other animals knew what we do to some of our unborn they'd think we were crazy.
I believe the Morning After Pill prevents implantation of a fertilised egg (if taken after fertilisation has occured).
Is there a question here? I said . .Which is also a secondary function of the contraceptive Pill, including the mini-pill. I'm interested in those pro-lifers who accept the Pill, what is the difference?
My understanding is that although both the Contraceptive Pill and Morning After Pill can act as abortifacient they can act to prevent fertilization (on which basis they are licensed in Ireland).
I suspect that some who are opposed to abortion do not oppose the Pill on the basis I have suggested, that they are licensed (and taken) with the intention of preventing fertilization.There are others involved in this thread. I am interested in those who think that abortion is wrong but the Pill is ok. As I said the prevention of implantation is the secondary function of the pill, the primary function to prevent fertilisation. There are a great many people who would be against abortion but for the Pill, and I would like to know if anyoe has an opinion on why that is.
I was always pro life, thought abortion was so wrong. Then I got pregnant at 19 with a person who wanted nothing to do with me or the child. Funny how you consider things you never thought you would when you find yourself in that position
I considered abortion and decided it wasn't for me. I also considered adoption and decided the same.
However, 6 years on I am strongly pro choice. Parenthood is hard. Being a single parent is hard. My life has changed beyond recognition, some ways for the better, some not. I adore my daughter but if I am 100% honest I do have some regrets.
I was fortunate that by 19 I had a good education and prospects. I have an amazing family who are so supportive and I manage ok. I cannot imagine how a girl would cope with no support and no prospects.
So while I cannot imagine ever having an abortion, and I have some issues with it, overall I feel that the right to choose is more important.
My daughter was a twin and I miscarried her sibling at 7 weeks. Now i do not look at her at feel upset or sad at the loss of the twin. I feel relief. That may sound harsh and perhaps it is but I am being honest. I could not have imagined having twins and the hardship that would entail. And I didn't have to make that decision, it was made for me so i feel no guilt. In some ways it was for the best as I feel if I had been carrying twins I would have had an abortion.
However the difference in essence is that if a man walks he can walk back. If a man chooses not to be involved and the woman has the child, if the man changes his mind then he can make contact and try to build a relationship with the child. For a woman either adoption or abortion is final, there is no going back from either.
Abortion is not a women's issue, it's a societal issue.I do wonder if men (not just posting here but generally speaking) can actually relate to this issue in its entirety because it is not something that will ever happen to a mans body.
Indeed, people's experiences can change their view on things. Like a pro-life talk I was at where one speaker previously worked in a abortion clinic and was now firmly pro-life or pro-choice people I know who, following the birth of their children, are now pro-life. I don't think one needs to be abused as a child to oppose child abuse.Ailbhe is an example of someone who changed their mind on the issue due to direct experience.
Abortion is not a women's issue, it's a societal issue.
So our laws are protecting the unborn but harming the women of this country in my opinion.
I would agree with this.And as we cannot have abortion on a case by case basis, we either have it or don't.
And entirely disagree with this.So our laws are protecting the unborn but harming the women of this country in my opinion.
The law doesn't harm women, their own decisions harm them.
And entirely disagree with this.
In your opinion. In mine the women are making a decision which is difficult but which they believe is for the best and having made that decision they are being forced to jump through hoops and put themselves through a lot simply because of a law, which lets face it, is outdated.
Abortion is not a women's issue, it's a societal issue.
Indeed, people's experiences can change their view on things. Like a pro-life talk I was at where one speaker previously worked in a abortion clinic and was now firmly pro-life or pro-choice people I know who, following the birth of their children, are now pro-life. I don't think one needs to be abused as a child to oppose child abuse.
But who says whether we have it or not? When was the last vote on abortion? Why has there been no vote in the last few years. Times are changing and those of us who are facing these decisions were too young to vote in the last referendum on abortion. Those who are older now, more than likely secure financially and emotionally are the ones making the decisions for young women. When will we get our chance to have our say?
This is true of lots of things that society deems to be undesirable and illegal. The fact that they happen anyway is not an arguement for legalising them. I am not commenting on abortion, just making a general point.Whether you are pro-life or not, you must admit that whatever strictures or legislation is put in place, abortion is a fact of life.
So change the law to suit yourself is it? You live in a country that has a law and complain when you have leave to get around it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?