Predictions for the reign of President Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.

If you think the maintenance of cordial relations between the leader of the most powerful country on earth without whom NATO would collapse and a country responsible for a million jobs as the largest single investor in the US is flailing about then I don't think you have a very firm grasp on international relations.
It's why Enda Kenny would be right to laugh at suggestions from low-grade Irish politicians that he should somehow snub Trump.
 
Not saying that .

What I do say and say clearly is that it helps no one internationally to have Mr Trump going out of his isolationist way to irritate people !
I do get the point of Enda etc , but why oh why create hassle .
 
Wahaay said:
The countries were already part of anti-terrorism legislation brought in by Obama because of the threat they posed.
The US perceived an intelligence-based threat from those countries before Trump came to power.
Click to expand...

This is a fair point, rightly or wrongly the countries on the list were identified during Obama's presidency. The omission of Saudi Arabia, home to most of the 9/11 bombers, from the list suggests however that the whole thing is just a PR exercise, with Mr Trump wanting to be seen taking action rather than seriously expecting it to have any impact on security.



Its a pity that unwarranted concerns are allowed to drive policy.

A serious analysis of what actions that are within the US control might increase their security might be a better place to start. Obama's decision not to bomb Syria was one of the few US foreign policy decisions in recent years that have not made the situation worse.
 
Delboy said:
The people of Aleppo might say otherwise
Click to expand...

The reporting of the situation in Aleppo contrasted with the reporting of the situation in Mosul is to my mind an excellent example of post fact news.

As I understand it the reality for both cities is that Sunni Islamic militants are being driven out by predominantly Shia militants supported by superpower bombing. The suffering in the affected cities must be unbearable.

The attack on Aleppo began in early November and lasted until 22 December. The attack on Mosul started 17 October and is ongoing.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-38132163

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-37702442

We in the west are expected to believe the smart US bombs are only killing bad guys in Mosul, while nasty Russian bombs are killing indiscriminately in Aleppo. You may accept this I don't.
 

What I meant by unwarranted were those small towns in America where the chances of terrorist attack are slim.
As a whole the country should be on high alert.
With regard to the 90-day ban six out of the seven countries involved ( all of which were already subject to anti-terrorism measures brought in by Obama ) have no functioning central government or intelligence service and Europe has seen plenty of examples of terrorists slipping into countries posing as refugees.
To suggest the US shouldn't be vigilant against those countries just because none of their citizens have been involved in terrorist attacks doesn't really wash I'm afraid.
I can't help thinking much of the protests against Trump are by Democrats still unable to accept that he won the Presidency.
Opinion polls show that his actions still reflect the views of a majority of US citizens,rightly or wrongly.
 
Wahaay said:
What I meant by unwarranted were those small towns in America where the chances of terrorist attack are slim.

As a whole the country should be on high alert.
Click to expand...
Yes, they should, but a ban is a stupid and blunt way of doing it and plays into the hands of their enemies.


What’s that got to do with anything? The USA isn’t taking refugees like we are.


Wahaay said:
To suggest the US shouldn't be vigilant against those countries just because none of their citizens have been involved in terrorist attacks doesn't really wash I'm afraid.
Click to expand...
Who said they shouldn’t be vigilant?


Wahaay said:
I can't help thinking much of the protests against Trump are by Democrats still unable to accept that he won the Presidency.
Click to expand...
I agree.

Wahaay said:
Opinion polls show that his actions still reflect the views of a majority of US citizens,rightly or wrongly.
Click to expand...
Can you post a link please?
 
 
Wahaay,
you are correct in that too much of anti-Trump stuff = hypocrisy .
But I have NIL doubt that he has handled this country/people blocking in a way that does not enhance the reality of real threats to USA and sadly just gives USA enemies a PR coup.
It is of little value to quote that more people support him , he should work for all Americans and enact legislation on known facts or threats.
I am very afraid that {islamists} are this generation of {bogeymen} , like the jews ,commies etc were .
When a leader has {bogeymen} he can twist real facts and will harm the USA .
Hope I am wrong..
 

The simple fact is that when every major terrorist atrocity since and including 9/11 has been carried out by Islamic extremists it is perfectly understandable that Trump wishes to enact the EO that he has.
It is a temporary ban covering Muslims and non-Muslims from those 7 countries.
The fact that a majority of Americans back his move is hugely important.His primary job is the welfare and security of the citizens.
 
Wahaay said:
The simple fact is that when every major terrorist atrocity since and including 9/11 has been carried out by Islamic extremists it is perfectly understandable that Trump wishes to enact the EO that he has.
Click to expand...

9/11 hmmm....Bin Laden and his links to the Saudi Royal family. Why didn't trump include Saudi Arabia in the list of countries he is currently banning people entering from?
 
It's all just populist pandering though. It's just an easy means of being seen to act while conveniently ignoring the real issues. It does nothing to address the fact that 83% of those charges with jihadist terrorism (for both domestic and foreign acts) are American citizens or permanent residents. Since 9/11, 94 people have died at the hands of 12 Jihadists, all 12 were American citizens or permanent residents, and none of those had family links back to any of the countries on the list of 7, but 3 x African-Americans, 3 had family links to Pakistan, 1 had Palestinian links, 2 Russia, 1 Egypt, 1 Kuwait and 1 Afghanistan.

To say all every major atrocity has been carried out by Islamic extremists fails to acknowledge the far-right extremists who have killed 55 people over that same period. Some argue they pose a far greater threat.
 


I think by populist pandering you must mean carrying out the promises on which he was elected.I know it's an unusual concept but that's why Trump surprised everyone with his election win.
It's also incredibly naive to suggest a country should base its terrorist threat simply on what has gone before it.
The Obama administration had very serious doubts about the seven countries on Trump's banned list and rightly so.Six of them have no functioning central government and it has been proved in Europe that terrorist atrocities have been carried out by citizens of those countries who have arrived on the continent posing as refugees.
 
Wahaay said:
I think by populist pandering you must mean carrying out the promises on which he was elected.
Click to expand...

In fairness to him, he is following through on some of his promises to date, but you have to remember his promises were mostly populist pandering in the first place.

Wahaay said:
It's also incredibly naive to suggest a country should base its terrorist threat simply on what has gone before it.
Click to expand...

No one has suggested they should simply focus all their efforts on countries where previous jihadists or their ancestors have come from. Trump has made a big deal about 'wiping out radical Islam'. His defence of the travel ban claiming it will have any positive effect on the overall threat level is beyond naive.
 
Wahaay said:
His primary job is the welfare and security of the citizens.
Click to expand...

I don't disagree but why focus on banning Muslims entering his country when a much greater threat to the safety of citizens in the US lies in gun control (or lack thereof) - the bit is bold is interesting - in 2013 alone more deaths were caused by accidental use of guns than have ever been killed by terrorists since 9/11. Over 33 thousand deaths in all!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States

In 2013, there were 73,505 nonfatal firearm injuries (23.2 injuries per 100,000 U.S. citizens),[2][3] and 33,636 deaths due to "injury by firearms" (10.6 deaths per 100,000 U.S. citizens).[4] These deaths consisted of 11,208 homicides,[5] 21,175 suicides,[4] 505 deaths due to accidental or negligent discharge of a firearm, and 281 deaths due to firearms use with "undetermined intent"

Populism at its best!
 


I agree entirely.
But every president of both political parties has failed to tackle gun control so it's hardly a charge to be levelled at Trump alone in his second week in office.
Also,none have managed to solve the problem of why the vast majority of victims and perpetrators of gun murders are young black males.
 
Wahaay said:
But every president of both political parties has failed to tackle gun control so it's hardly a charge to be levelled at Trump alone in his second week in office.
Click to expand...

I agree with that but my point is that I consider it to be populist to be banning entrants from some Muslim countries, in the name of safe-guarding American lives, when a much bigger threat is alive & well inside their borders already.
 
It's a populist and opportunist publicity stunt.

It's only for a short period until the "extreme vetting" is in place. 90 days or whatever will have totally negligible effect in terms of stopping bad dudes getting in.

But it is getting massive publicity giving the impression of a man of action who delivers on his promises. If he had simply waited and announced when extreme vetting was in place, that would go down like a lead balloon with the rednecks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Menu
Log in
Register