Prearrears, negotiating with bank


Quite a nosey comment!

If you must know. In 2006 we had considerable positve equity, my salary was higher, rents were stronger, and my wife was working. My earning potential then was far greater than it is now. We bought our family home in the height of the housing boom. No mystery.
 

Thanks Bronte, great info regarding cross secured, that ends an idea of strategic payements. As for selling our PPR, if we were to do that we'd most likely move abroad. Our last option.

I'll dig up the terms in time.
 
Ok you can ignore this as wishful thinking but if you want to keep all properties and make capital repayments against all then...

Current total monthly repayment 6600

Total monthly capital + interest 9000 *(approx based on estimated term lengths and uncertainity over full repayment amount for inv property 1)

Max affordable monthly repayment 7400 *(net income 10,400 minus monthly living expenses 3,000)

1: Pay off a lump sum of 78400* off PPR leaving term unchanged *(savings minus three months net salary as emergency reserve)
Reduces monthly cap + int to 8650

2: Extend PPR term to 30 years *(considering your youth and solid income)
Reduces monthly cap + int to 8100

This leaves another 700 per month to square the circle which could be achieved in a few ways:

Extending the partial interest only on the first investment property approx 400/month
Increasing income (is it possible to raise rents?)
Supplementing repayments from remaining savings
Asking your lender for an incentive to pay off the lump sum of 78400
Increase term on one or more investment properties

More than likely a combination of all five!

This may result in a lower standard of living for a period, and is probably NOT a prudent investment choice, but it could work out!


(I have estimated the terms as follows, which match the repayments - PPR 24 yrs, INV1 25 years, INV2 25 years and INV3 18 years)
 

Thank you Cian8 for taking the time to go into so much detail. Its encouraging to see it may be possible.

Just one question, how do you calculate net income of 10,400? Are you using a formula considering income tax, USC etc? and does it consider income tax on the rent. Not doubting your figures, it just seems that we have more income than we realise.

Again, many thanks, I am very encouraged by the thought it may be affordable with a few tweaks.
 
Bronte and Cian8,

Update on actual terms.

PPR 26yrs left.
BTL1 146K (cap and Int) 24yrs and 246k (Int only) 19yrs
BTL2 164K (cap and int) 24yrs and 167k (cap and int) 25yrs
BTL 3 70k (cap and int) 25yrs and 157k (cap and int) 17yrs and 14k (cap and int) 11yrs
 
That's very strange, 2 of the BTL's have 2 loans and one has 3? Did you take out equity?


As you're young you could try extending the terms on some of those to reduce the repayments. I wonder would your bank be agreeable to that. But you should use the 100K to make a reduction somewhere (where it is of most benefit). For example right now you could pay off the 70K and 14K on BTL number 3. How much extra income would that give you?

Why can you not sell the PPR and move into one of the rentals?
 

You didn't have to answer, of course. Not may 26 year olds earning over €150k. Well done on that front alone. I'd push the loans out for as long as you can, even if you had to give up some of your free cash as a sweetener.
 

I dont think this is a full picture regarding cross security.

If a loan is secured on a property, the lender can seek to repossess that property if the loan is not being repaid.

However if the loan on your PPR is up to date the EBS cannot seek to exercise their security over the PPR.

If other loans are behind on buy to lets then EBS would have to go through a process on those, i.e. sell the buy to lets and then pursue you for the shortfall before they could get into court on your PPR. And all the family home protection legislation would be in your favour. I dont think that family homes are often repossessed to pay debts which are not secured against them.

Bronte is right that you still owe the money and they can go after your PPR, but it is a much longer road than if there was cross security.

How important is this difference, well I suggest it is the reason that EBS wanted you to go interest only on the PPR instead of the buy to lets.

Regarding the rest of the tread a plan seems to be evolving to improve cashflow and pay off the debt over a longer period.

If you do adopt such a plan, it is up to you to implement it. Make your plan, tell the bank what you are doing and do it, dont think in terms of asking their permission.

I suggest that the first part of the plan is to pay capital and interest on your home. After all saving your home seems to be the main purpose of the plan. Then pay as much capital as you can afford on the buy to lets.
 
Just one further thought. Your borrowings are €1.6 million. A rate increase of 1% would cost you €16,000 a year. There is no point in a plan that works, barely, now and would collapse with a small increase in rates.

It would be a pity to scrimp for 5 years then find that the rates increased and you were back to square one.
 

Hi Bronte,

yea, extra loans were equity release to buy next house etc.

If we are to move from PPR its going to part of the problem ( we'll take it all the way in court if necessary ), not the solution. If we are to spend the rest of our lives paying debt then we want to live where we are. otherwise we'll just leave the jurisdiction and declare bankrupt. We have to have an incentive.
 
You didn't have to answer, of course. Not may 26 year olds earning over €150k. Well done on that front alone. I'd push the loans out for as long as you can, even if you had to give up some of your free cash as a sweetener.

Thanks PE2013. Its rare now for sure, but was more common in 2006!
 

Cremeegg,

Great info in this post. Thats what I tought. It would make the PPR more secure.

What if we paid the PPR 100% and one BTL 100% (one solely in my wifes name) and defaulted completely in 2 BTL's (solely in my name)? That way I'm the big bad wolf, my wife and the kids are clean. Therefore 2/3rds of the household are in the courts eyes compliant. I know I'm getting sneaky now but a reasonable man has no place in negotiations!

I have thought about interest rate hikes but I don't believe Europe is out of the woods yet, or close for that matter. Also, following a massive recession inflation runs riot. If salaries and rents keep a pace then the situation at worst will stay the same.......... I hope!

Again, thanks to you and all for your time and comment, I have plenty of food for thought. Ideas are settling and a plan is forming.
 
I think the O.P. has negative equity of approx €590,000. In the hypothetical situation if he/she was to sell all the property that is the balance that would be owed....or maybe even a bit more after selling costs of about 80k - paying auctioneers and legal bills.

There is a strong case for the OP to leave the country and build a decent life abroad while he / she is still young ( only 32 ), and before interest rates rise as they inevitably will. He/she should do the best for the 2 young kids. After a few years in England he/she could always return. The OP is unusual (and perhaps lucky, but I do not begrudge luck, sometime hard talented workers make their own luck ) in that he/she is young, presumably highly qualified and has excellent earning prospects abroad as well as here. He/she earns more that the prime minister of many countries eg New Zealand.

If the OP's home is worth 650k now, and he/she is aged 32 now, it may have cost 1.3 million or more if bought at the height of the boom in 2006 as implied?
What struck me as unusual is that the bank would have lent this amount of money to say a 25 year old in a private sector job? Should lending not have been based on 2.5 times salary + salary of his spouse, or whatever?

Not that many years ago (20/21 years ago) interest rates touched over 18%...imagine the repayments then on mortgages totallying a couple of million! IIn my humble opinion the OP would be foolish to stay in Ireland...should go to some country where the banks will not lend a couple of million to a 25 year old employee!
 
After all the speculations which have got you into huge financial troubles, you are still willing to speculate even further not selling the BTLs? I would have thought that you had learnt a lesson from this whole experience!?
 
After all the speculations which have got you into huge financial troubles, you are still willing to speculate even further not selling the BTLs? I would have thought that you had learnt a lesson from this whole experience!?

I never said I was not willing to sell BTL's. I am seeking advice, not judgement. I f you read all the posts some suggestions have included selling BTL's now. I'd love to sell. Bank may not let me sell as the balance will be unsecured. Another consideration is the cost of holding and selling later versus selling now (firesale).

Happy Easter
 
Hi Sprinsteen,

You have a big advantage having all your loans with one lender as this makes any negotiations much easier albeit still very tough!

The way I see your situation is that EBS are most likely VERY happy with you at the moment given that you are paying all your loans as agreed. They will continue to put maximum pressure on you and will be less likely to agree a more long term solution that works best for you as long as you continue to pay all mortgages.

If I were in your shoes I would do 1 of 3 things:

1. Negotiate really hard with EBS (might mean you need to default to put pressure on them) to get all the BTL's on Interest Only for as long as possible (5 to 10 years) in order for the NE to erode away somewhat and then sell if it makes sense to do so. The goal would be to effectively get these to wash their face until you dispose of them. Continue to pay your PPR with Cap & Int with perhaps an extended term. This will give you maximum breathing space and if you are flush with cash you could still use it to pay lump sums off your PPR mortgage.

2. Surrender all the BTL's to EBS and try to negotiate a writedown of between 50% and 100% of the NE of those mortgages. Whatever they don't agree to writedown you could agree to add the balance onto your PPR and then extend the term of your PPR resident mortgage right out so that it is perfectly affordable on Cap & Int. A split mortgage is another option to consider with this too. This would put your life back to normal the quickest!

3. I know your are very reluctant (understandably) to move abroad but given that you could make very good money oversees (I assume the UK would be one of your options?) then perhaps you would consider a 3 to 5 year plan, declare bankruptcy in the UK and then building a very large pot of cash quite quickly and return to Ireland and buy a house for cash completely debt free!


Just my 2 cents but I definitely wouldn't be working your butt off for the next 10 years to be giving every cent to EBS just to arrive at a point where you are at breakeven!

Good luck in your negotiations!
 

Ciarank,

Thanks for the time and suggestions. On your second point, I have considered a slight variation. Assuming we are 300k in neg equity. If the bank write of 100k, we bring in 100k, and we pay the remaining 100k over 30 years. That'll leave us with just the home loan. The write down of 100k is approx 5% of our total borrowings, I might even ask for 200k (10%) off. The tracker on the PPR of course would have to survive in the deal. We'll see.

Thanks again, happy easter.
 

If you are willing to put the €100k in then I think you have a very good chance of getting a €200k write off or something close to it. However be VERY careful even suggesting this to EBS as they will take the hand off you if it's offered up too easy and too early!

Start the negotiations without even mentioning the €100k. Try negotiating the first €100k to €150k off the NE of the BTL's and then introduce the €100k cash if they knock another €50k or €75k off or something to that effect.