BobRoberts
Registered User
- Messages
- 3
This is a ridiculous situation brought about by my irrational narcissistic mother.
She has always been difficult, but has gotten worse since my father died.
She does not drive, but is fairly active for her age, and lives about 5 miles from a little town. There is a bus on her doorstep, and she has friends who can give her lifts.
My father, before he died, said I could have his car. I only passed my test last February and did not have a car when he died in in July last year.
My mother bizarrely has it in her head that friends will be more likely to give her lifts if she owned a car, rather than in their own car. She has talked about how sometimes it is inconvenient for them to give her a lift, but is incapable of saying when it would be inconvenient to give her a lift in their car, but somehow would be convenient to give her a lift in their car.
Not to mention the expense - she would have to pay for the tax, insurance and upkeep of the car. Or, if she is worried about people using petrol, just give them some money or a thank you gift once in a while.
In every practical sense, it makes no sense for an 80 yr old woman to own a car, just for the reasons given.
So I am wondering where I might stand legally - the car is now in my name, and I am paying the tax, insurance etc. But in her mind I have "robbed her of everything". And I guess, I am a little wary that legally, if not practically, that may have merit. If the car wasn't specified to go to someone else, it would reasonably be included in the "everything" that would be left to her.
Any advice or comment would be very welcome.
Thank you.
She has always been difficult, but has gotten worse since my father died.
She does not drive, but is fairly active for her age, and lives about 5 miles from a little town. There is a bus on her doorstep, and she has friends who can give her lifts.
My father, before he died, said I could have his car. I only passed my test last February and did not have a car when he died in in July last year.
My mother bizarrely has it in her head that friends will be more likely to give her lifts if she owned a car, rather than in their own car. She has talked about how sometimes it is inconvenient for them to give her a lift, but is incapable of saying when it would be inconvenient to give her a lift in their car, but somehow would be convenient to give her a lift in their car.
Not to mention the expense - she would have to pay for the tax, insurance and upkeep of the car. Or, if she is worried about people using petrol, just give them some money or a thank you gift once in a while.
In every practical sense, it makes no sense for an 80 yr old woman to own a car, just for the reasons given.
So I am wondering where I might stand legally - the car is now in my name, and I am paying the tax, insurance etc. But in her mind I have "robbed her of everything". And I guess, I am a little wary that legally, if not practically, that may have merit. If the car wasn't specified to go to someone else, it would reasonably be included in the "everything" that would be left to her.
Any advice or comment would be very welcome.
Thank you.