Alba Longa
Registered User
- Messages
- 75
It may be the opinion of many people but is it backed up by any recognised and verified scientific research?Alba Longa said:The molecules of genetically modified food do not exist in nature. When our body comes in contact with them it tries to reject them. The fight for rejection causes such the immune system to overwork, producing a depletion of energy and in some cases immune system failure.
This is my opinion and the opinion of many world scientists that are not publicised too much.
Note also that Doctor (I don't think that he's actually a Professor) Pusztai's research/methodology has been criticised by a Royal Society committee:Q8. Are GM foods safe?
Different GM organisms include different genes inserted in different ways. This means that individual GM foods and their safety should be assessed on a case-by-case basis and that it is not possible to make general statements on the safety of all GM foods.
GM foods currently available on the international market have passed risk assessments and are not likely to present risks for human health. In addition, no effects on human health have been shown as a result of the consumption of such foods by the general population in the countries where they have been approved. Continuous use of risk assessments based on the Codex principles and, where appropriate, including post market monitoring, should form the basis for evaluating the safety of GM foods.
It [The Lancet] has also been criticised for publishing research by Arpad Pusztai that claimed to show that GM potatoes produced worrying biological changes in rats. A Royal Society committee found it was based on poorly conducted experiments.
That Independent article is very interesting and points out many of the flaws in the research identified by other experts in this area.Alba Longa said:ajapale,
A hungarian,Professor Arpad Pusztai researched potatoes in 1999, but was forced to resign bucause of his views.
GM food was a common point for discussion a couple of years back, but you don't hear much nowadays. See [broken link removed]
!
blueshoes said:i too am so fed up of this problem with potatoes i have tried them all but if u get potatoes that are grown without artificial fertiliser they wont boil into mush. these are the only ones recently that i have bought which cook properly. and all the green potatoes i am finding its unreal i dunno wot the crack is with them!
I doubt that potatoes can be grown without any fertiliser at all. Or maybe just very small ones? Or do you mean without "artificial" fertiliser?Andrewa said:Thanks - and where can you get potatoes that are grown without fertiliser?
ClubMan said:I doubt that potatoes can be grown without any fertiliser at all. Or maybe just very small ones? Or do you mean without "artificial" fertiliser?
National tastes also affect prices across the eurozone. For example, Irish consumers prefer “floury” potatoes. However, these varieties of potatoes tend to achieve a lower crop yield, sometimes up to 20 percent less than that of waxy/soapy potatoes preferred by other countries, thus making the potatoes we eat relatively more expensive;
RainyDay said:Soapy is basically the opposite of floury - it is the almost waxy solid potato that doesn't break up on the plate or on the fork and retains its structure until it hits your mouth.
I rarely eat spuds in electrical shops, but everyone to their own, I guess....Cahir said:My favourite too - especially in currys.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?